We Resolve Legal Matters
How can we assist you?
Blogs
More-
Involved in a USDT Exchange Transaction in Korea?
Legal Risks of Crypto OTC Transactions, Money Laundering Allegations, and Accomplice Liability Some individuals become involved in USDT (Tether) exchange transactions in Korea believing they are simply helping with a private crypto transfer or OTC deal, only to later find themselves under investigation for fraud, money laundering, or violations of Korean financial regulations. In recent years, Korean investigative authorities have increasingly focused on crypto-based money laundering structures connected to voice phishing, investment scams, illegal gambling operations, and overseas criminal organizations. As a result, even participants who were not part of the original scam may become subject to criminal investigation if they are found to have handled, converted, or transferred suspicious funds. This article explains the key Korean laws, court precedents, and investigative standards commonly applied in USDT exchange cases involving alleged accomplice liability or concealment of criminal proceeds. Why USDT Is Frequently Used in Money Laundering Schemes USDT (Tether) is a stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar and is widely used because of its relatively stable value and fast cross-border transfer capability. However, these same characteristics also make USDT attractive to criminal organizations seeking to move or conceal illegally obtained funds. In Korea, investigative authorities have recently uncovered multiple cases where proceeds from voice phishing or investment fraud were converted into USDT and transferred to overseas wallets or cash-out channels. In March 2026, for example, Seoul Jungnang Police announced the arrest of 19 individuals involved in laundering fraud proceeds through USDT conversion schemes linked to overseas criminal groups, with approximately KRW 6 billion in criminal assets seized. Under Korea’s Act on Reporting and Use of Certain Financial Transaction Information (commonly referred to as the “Special Financial Transactions Act” or “Special Act”), anti-money laundering obligations primarily apply to registered Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs). As a result, OTC crypto transactions conducted privately between individuals often become a gray area where the participant’s knowledge and intent become the central legal issue. Major Korean Laws That May Apply 1) Fraud Accomplice Liability Under the Korean Criminal Act If a person is found to have participated in the movement, exchange, or delivery of funds obtained through fraud, Korean prosecutors may investigate whether that person acted as: a joint principal offender (co-principal), or an aider and abettor (accessory) under Articles 30 and 32 of the Korean Criminal Act. The key issue is whether the participant knowingly assisted the fraudulent scheme or merely engaged in what appeared to be an ordinary transaction. 2) Act on Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment One of the most commonly applied statutes in these cases is Korea’s Act on Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment. The law criminalizes conduct such as: disguising the acquisition or disposition of criminal proceeds, concealing the origin of criminal proceeds, or hiding or transferring criminal assets. In practice, converting fraud proceeds into cryptocurrency, cashing out USDT, or transferring funds through third-party wallets may all be viewed by investigators as potential money laundering activity. The central legal question is usually whether the person handling the transaction knew — or at least should have suspected — that the funds were connected to criminal activity. 3) Korean Special Financial Transactions Act (Crypto Business Registration Issues) Individuals who repeatedly exchange USDT or conduct OTC crypto transactions for commission-based profit may also face allegations of operating an unregistered virtual asset business. Korean authorities generally look at factors such as: repeated or continuous transactions, receipt of commissions or service fees, dealing with multiple counterparties, and operation resembling a commercial exchange service. A one-time transaction between acquaintances is treated differently from ongoing exchange activity conducted for profit. 4) Foreign Exchange Transactions Act In some cases, Korea’s Foreign Exchange Transactions Act may also become relevant. This typically arises where funds are transferred internationally, including situations involving overseas wallets, offshore entities, or cross-border settlement structures. If the transaction occurred solely between domestic parties using Korean won, investigators may focus more heavily on money laundering or crypto regulatory issues rather than foreign exchange violations. However, international transfer structures may trigger additional scrutiny. The Most Important Legal Issue: “Willful Blindness” or Implied Criminal Intent One of the most important legal concepts in these investigations is whether the participant had criminal intent — including so-called “willful blindness” or implied awareness. The Korean Supreme Court has ruled as follows: To punish a person for concealing criminal proceeds, it is sufficient that the person recognized the property as criminal proceeds in general terms; it is not necessary for the person to know the exact type or details of the underlying crime. — Korean Supreme Court Decision 2006Do5288, Jan. 11, 2007 This means that even if someone claims: “I did not know it was voice phishing money,” or “I thought it was related to tax avoidance or gambling,” criminal liability may still arise if the person recognized that the funds were likely illegal in some form. Importantly, Korean courts may separately recognize liability for concealing criminal proceeds even where accomplice liability for the original fraud itself is disputed. The two offenses are legally distinct. Factors Korean Investigators Commonly Use to Infer Criminal Awareness Investigative authorities do not rely solely on direct admissions. Instead, they often infer intent based on the overall transaction structure. Common factors include: ▪️Unofficial OTC Transaction Methods Transactions conducted outside registered exchanges or through private channels are often viewed as higher-risk structures. ▪️Repeated Transactions Repeated dealings using similar methods may be interpreted as evidence that the participant understood the suspicious nature of the activity. This may also support allegations of operating an unregistered crypto business. ▪️Excessive Commissions or Fees Receiving unusually high compensation compared to ordinary exchange fees may be treated as evidence of awareness of illegal risk. ▪️Lack of Identity Verification Transactions involving anonymous parties, unverifiable identities, or disappearing counterparties may raise additional suspicion. ▪️Blockchain Transaction Analysis Because cryptocurrency transfers are recorded on the blockchain, Korean authorities increasingly use blockchain forensic analysis to trace fund flows and identify links between victim funds and crypto wallets. Where several of these factors appear together, prosecutors may argue that the participant at least “implicitly recognized” the illegal nature of the funds. Defense Strategy: Explaining Why Criminal Awareness Did Not Exist In these cases, simply stating “I did not know” is rarely enough. Because Korean courts broadly recognize implied criminal intent, the defense must often demonstrate — through objective facts and evidence — why the person could not reasonably have recognized the funds as criminal proceeds. Important factors may include: how the relationship with the counterparty developed, why the transaction appeared legitimate at the time, whether there were objective warning signs, how the transaction was explained to the participant, and whether statements remain consistent with blockchain records and messaging history. Early-stage responses are particularly important because investigators often already possess substantial transaction data before conducting interviews. An inconsistent or poorly prepared initial statement may later be used to strengthen suspicions. In addition, allegations involving fraud accomplice liability, criminal proceeds concealment, crypto business registration issues, and foreign exchange violations each involve different legal elements. Identifying the actual scope of potential liability at an early stage is therefore critical. Decent Law Firm | Digital Asset & Crypto Investigation Team USDT-related investigations in Korea often involve complex issues extending beyond ordinary crypto transactions, including blockchain tracing analysis, accomplice liability, money laundering regulations, crypto compliance obligations, and foreign exchange law. At Decent Law Firm, our digital asset and crypto investigation team has experience handling cryptocurrency-related investigations from the initial investigation stage through criminal trial proceedings. If you have been contacted by Korean investigative authorities or are unsure about the allegations being raised, careful early-stage legal review is strongly recommended. This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice for any specific case.
-
Pre-Trial Detention Hearing Strategy in Korea: Why You Need a Criminal Defense Lawyer Immediately
A detention warrant request is not the end of an investigation — in many cases, it is the moment that determines the direction of the entire criminal case. In Korea, once prosecutors request a detention warrant, the court usually conducts a pre-trial detention hearing within approximately 48 hours. What happens during this short window can significantly affect whether the suspect remains free or is taken into custody. Only 48 Hours to Prepare A Korean pre-trial detention hearing (often referred to as a warrant review hearing) is a procedure where a judge directly questions the suspect before deciding whether detention is necessary. Within this limited timeframe, the defense team must quickly: review the investigation status, meet the detained suspect, analyze statements and evidence, prepare written submissions, organize supporting materials, and develop a hearing strategy. In practice, many detention decisions are heavily influenced by the preparation completed before the hearing even begins. What Korean Courts Focus on in Detention Hearings Korean courts generally evaluate three core issues when deciding whether to issue a detention warrant. 1. Risk of Flight The court considers whether the suspect may avoid future investigation or trial proceedings. Stable residence, employment, family ties, and long-term connections to Korea can become important factors supporting release. 2. Risk of Evidence Tampering Judges also examine whether the suspect may destroy evidence, influence witnesses, or coordinate statements with related parties. If major evidence has already been secured and the suspect has cooperated with investigators, these points may help reduce concerns about detention necessity. 3. Seriousness of the Alleged Crime The court reviews the severity of the allegations, potential repeat offenses, financial damage, and overall case structure. At the same time, factors such as victim compensation efforts, settlement discussions, remorse, or legal disputes regarding the allegations may also be considered by the court. A criminal defense lawyer structures the defense strategy around these exact legal standards rather than relying on emotional appeals alone. A Detention Hearing Lawyer Does Much More Than Attend Court Effective defense in detention cases is usually built before the hearing date. ✔️ Immediate Client Interview and Statement Review The lawyer meets the suspect as quickly as possible to understand the case structure, prior statements made to investigators, and any inconsistencies or legal risks that may affect the hearing. ✔️ Written Opinions and Supporting Materials Defense counsel prepares written submissions explaining why detention is unnecessary. These materials may include: proof of residence, employment records, family relationship documents, medical conditions, cooperation history, transaction records, contracts, or communication evidence relevant to the allegations. The quality and organization of these submissions can directly affect the judge’s perception of the case. ✔️ Hearing Preparation and Statement Strategy During the hearing, suspects are questioned directly by the judge. Answers given during this process can significantly influence the outcome. An experienced lawyer helps prepare how key facts should be explained, which issues require caution, and how to maintain a consistent legal position throughout the hearing. ✔️ Planning for Possible Detention Even before the hearing concludes, the defense may also prepare follow-up measures such as detention review requests, bail applications, or additional legal filings if detention is ultimately granted. Early Defense Is Especially Important in Financial and Crypto-Related Cases Cases involving cryptocurrency, investment disputes, fraud allegations, voice phishing, OTC crypto transactions, or financial crimes are often highly technical and document-heavy. Simply claiming innocence is rarely enough. The defense must clearly explain transaction structures, fund flows, business relationships, and the suspect’s actual role in a way the court can realistically understand within a short hearing. In multi-party investigations, statements made by co-defendants or related individuals can also create additional risks at the detention stage. For foreign nationals living in Korea or international business operators, these risks may become even more serious due to language barriers, visa concerns, or misunderstandings regarding Korean criminal procedures. Detention Is Not a Conviction — But It Changes Everything A detention warrant does not mean guilt has been proven. However, actual detention can severely affect: preparation of the defense, business operations, employment, immigration status, family life, and psychological stability. There is a substantial practical difference between defending a criminal case while free and defending it while detained. If you have been contacted by Korean investigators or informed that a detention warrant may be requested, immediate legal review is strongly recommended. The criminal defense team at Decent Law Firm handles detention hearings, financial crime investigations, cryptocurrency-related criminal matters, and complex economic crime cases involving both Korean and foreign clients in Korea. Early action often shapes the outcome.
-
AI Crypto Scam: What to Do If You Cannot Withdraw Your Funds
As interest in artificial intelligence continues to grow, crypto scammers are increasingly using “AI-powered investment platforms” and “AI trading systems” to attract investors. These scams often appear sophisticated. They may provide polished whitepapers, fake AI trading dashboards, technical presentations, and fabricated success stories to create the illusion of legitimacy. At first, small withdrawals may work normally. However, once a larger amount is invested, victims frequently encounter withdrawal restrictions and repeated requests for additional payments. For foreign investors living in or interested in Korea, understanding these patterns early can make a significant difference in preserving evidence and responding effectively. What Is an AI Crypto Scam? An AI crypto scam is a type of cryptocurrency fraud where scammers falsely claim to operate AI-based trading technology, automated investment systems, or advanced blockchain algorithms in order to obtain investor funds. Unlike older crypto scams that relied mainly on unrealistic profit promises, AI-related scams tend to look far more convincing because they use technical language and complex-looking systems that ordinary investors cannot easily verify. Common examples include: “AI automated trading” platforms Fake AI investment algorithms AI-powered coin analysis systems Fabricated development teams and partnerships Telegram or KakaoTalk investment groups promoting “AI-selected coins” In many cases, the underlying technology either does not exist at all or consists only of publicly available open-source tools presented as proprietary AI technology. Common Types of AI Crypto Scam Schemes Fake AI Technology and Whitepapers Scammers often publish professional-looking whitepapers filled with technical terminology, charts, and fake development roadmaps. Before investing, investors should carefully review: Whether the developers are real people LinkedIn profiles and professional history GitHub repositories and development activity Whether partnerships and investors actually exist Many fraudulent projects use fabricated team members or copied technical materials. Presale Investment Fraud Another common scheme involves selling tokens before a supposed exchange listing. Victims are told they are receiving a “special presale opportunity” before the token is listed on major exchanges such as Upbit or Binance. Typical warning signs include: Guaranteed future listings Promises of “100x returns” VIP insider investment opportunities Claims of limited early-access token allocations In reality, many projects disappear entirely after collecting investor funds. Fake Exchanges and AI Trading Platforms Some scammers direct victims to private trading apps or fake exchanges operated entirely by the fraud group. The structure often follows the same pattern: Small withdrawals are allowed initially Investors are encouraged to deposit larger amounts Withdrawals become restricted Additional fees are demanded Communication suddenly stops Requests to install unofficial apps or use unknown platforms should be treated with extreme caution. Signs That You May Already Be a Victim If any of the following situations apply, additional transfers should be stopped immediately. Requests for Taxes or Verification Fees One of the most common scam tactics is demanding advance payment before withdrawals are processed. Victims may be told they must pay: Taxes Wallet activation fees AML verification costs Security deposits International transfer charges Legitimate exchanges generally do not require separate personal transfers in order to release withdrawal funds. Financial Authority Impersonation Some scammers pretend to represent regulators, compliance teams, or financial institutions. They may falsely claim that: Your account has been flagged for money laundering Additional compliance checks are required Korean financial authorities are reviewing the transaction A temporary security payment must be made These are frequently used to pressure victims into sending more money. Continuous Withdrawal Delays Scammers often use technical excuses to delay withdrawals, including: Wallet maintenance Node synchronization problems Security upgrades Hacking attempts International approval delays Repeated postponements are a major warning sign. Sudden Loss of Communication Victims often report that customer service suddenly disappears after additional payments are refused. In many cases: Telegram administrators block users Support responses become automated Account managers disappear entirely Websites or apps suddenly shut down What To Do If You Are a Victim of an AI Crypto Scam 1. Stop Sending Additional Money No matter what explanation is provided, additional payments should not be made. Scammers frequently exploit victims psychologically by claiming that “one final payment” will unlock the withdrawal process. In practice, additional deposits usually lead only to larger losses. 2. Contact Your Bank Immediately If the transfer was recent, contact your bank as quickly as possible and explain that the transaction may involve fraud. Unlike voice phishing cases, crypto-related fraud may not always qualify for immediate account suspension under Korean law. However, early reporting can still help preserve transaction records and improve response options. Obtaining a police incident confirmation document may also assist in certain cases. 3. Preserve All Evidence The following materials should be saved immediately: Whitepapers and advertisements Wallet addresses and transaction records Screenshots of the platform Telegram, KakaoTalk, or email conversations Voice recordings and investment solicitations Contracts or investment documents Because fraudulent platforms can disappear without warning, early evidence preservation is critical. 4. Report the Case and Seek Legal Advice AI crypto scams may involve multiple legal issues, including: Fraud Illegal fundraising schemes Financial regulatory violations Money laundering-related offenses Electronic financial transaction violations Many scams also involve overseas entities, cross-border fund transfers, and anonymous crypto wallets, making early strategic response especially important. The longer the delay, the more difficult asset tracing and evidence collection may become. Early Response Can Make a Difference AI crypto scams are not simply failed investments. In many cases, they involve organized fraudulent operations designed to systematically prevent withdrawals and extract additional payments from victims. If withdrawals have been blocked or communication has stopped, it is important to review the situation carefully and respond quickly. Decent Law Firm’s digital asset and crypto disputes team advises clients on crypto investment fraud, asset tracing, criminal complaints, and cross-border legal response strategies related to cryptocurrency scams in Korea. Even with limited initial materials, it may still be possible to assess the structure of the case and discuss available legal options.
-
Real Estate Presale Scams in Korea: Warning Signs You Should Never Ignore
“Congratulations, you’ve been selected for a special apartment presale.” If you recently received a call, text message, or KakaoTalk message like this in Korea, it may not be a legitimate housing offer — it could be a sophisticated real estate voice phishing scam. In recent years, scams involving apartment presale rights (“bunyang rights”) have become increasingly advanced. Fraudsters now impersonate developers, sales agencies, financial institutions, and even public organizations while using fake websites, forged contracts, and manipulated caller IDs to appear legitimate. For foreigners living in or investing in Korea, these scams can be particularly confusing because the Korean real estate subscription and presale system is already complex. This article explains the most common types of Korean apartment presale scams and what to do if you become a victim. Why Apartment Presale Scams in Korea Are So Convincing Real estate presale scams in Korea typically involve fraudsters contacting victims through phone calls, text messages, messaging apps, or fake websites in order to steal deposits or personal information. These scams are difficult to identify because they often imitate actual Korean apartment subscription and presale procedures. Scammers frequently: Use the names of real apartment complexes currently under development Impersonate legitimate developers or sales agencies Create fake Korean real estate websites and contracts Manipulate caller ID information Offer “urgent” discounted presale rights far below market price Many victims only realize they were scammed after funds have already been transferred. 3 Common Types of Korean Presale Fraud 1. Fake Subscription Winner Scam Victims receive messages claiming they were selected for a “special supply” apartment opportunity or priority subscription allocation. The scammer then demands advance payments for: document processing fees priority reservation fees subscription maintenance fees special allocation deposits In legitimate Korean apartment subscription procedures, these kinds of payments are generally not requested through personal bank accounts. If someone asks you to transfer money to an individual account, you should treat it as a major warning sign. 2. “Cheap Presale Rights” Deposit Scam Scammers advertise apartment presale rights at prices significantly below market value and pressure victims to send deposits quickly. They often claim: “This is an urgent resale” “The seller needs immediate cash” “The deal expires today” After receiving the deposit or premium payment, the scammer disappears. This type of fraud is increasingly common in Korea’s online real estate communities and messaging platforms. 3. Fake Developer or Sales Agency Impersonation Some scammers create highly convincing fake sales channels using the names of actual apartment projects currently under construction. They may provide: fake contracts forged official documents cloned websites fake customer service numbers Before making any payment, you should independently verify: the official developer website company registration details official contact numbers payment account ownership actual apartment subscription announcements What To Do If You Sent Money Step 1. Request Immediate Payment Suspension If you transferred money, contact your bank immediately and request a payment suspension or fraud report. Time is critical in Korean voice phishing cases. In many situations, the first 24 hours are the most important for preventing withdrawal or further transfer of funds. Step 2. Preserve Evidence You should immediately save and back up all relevant materials, including: text messages KakaoTalk conversations call records and recordings bank transfer receipts contracts or documents received screenshots of websites and profiles Digital evidence can disappear quickly, especially in messaging applications. Step 3. Report the Case to Korean Authorities Victims can report the incident through: the Korean Cyber Crime Reporting System (ECRM) local police stations in Korea Providing organized evidence from the beginning can significantly affect how quickly the investigation progresses. Step 4. Review Civil and Criminal Legal Options Depending on the case, additional legal actions may include: criminal complaints for fraud account freezing or provisional seizure applications civil damage claims tracing related accounts and accomplices Actual recovery possibilities vary depending on the remaining account balance, fund movement, and whether organized fraud groups are involved. Fast Legal Action Matters in Korean Real Estate Fraud Cases Many victims delay reporting because they hope the transaction may still be legitimate. Unfortunately, scammers often use that hesitation to move or withdraw funds before legal action begins. Apartment presale fraud cases in Korea require fast evidence preservation and immediate legal action to improve the chances of recovery. If you are unsure whether the situation qualifies as fraud, it is still important to seek legal review as early as possible. Decent Law Firm advises both Korean and foreign clients on Korean voice phishing, real estate fraud, and financial crime matters, including early-stage reporting, evidence organization, criminal complaints, and asset recovery strategy.
-
Crypto Money Mule Scams in Korea: "I Thought It Was Just a Part-Time Job" Won't Keep You Out of Prison
"It's an overseas Bitcoin purchasing service — just buy the coins and send them for us, and we'll pay you a commission." People who accepted offers like this and got involved are increasingly finding themselves under criminal investigation. Simply doing what they were told — buying and sending cryptocurrency — can be treated as playing a central role in a voice phishing operation, and custodial sentences are being handed down with regularity. How Crypto Money Mule Scams Work Voice phishing organizations have shifted away from cash withdrawal methods toward converting stolen funds into cryptocurrency. The scheme works as follows: victims are deceived into transferring money into an exchange account, the mule purchases Bitcoin or another cryptocurrency with those funds, and the coins are immediately sent to a designated wallet address. Once funds are converted to crypto and moved through multiple wallets, tracing and recovering them becomes extremely difficult. How People Get Recruited Most crypto money mules did not set out to participate in crime. They were approached with offers that sounded legitimate. "Just receive money in your account, buy crypto on an exchange, and send it — we'll pay you a fee" "Help us with some transfers to build up loan eligibility records" "Crypto exchange errand, high daily earnings guaranteed" Even if someone's only role was handling transfers and buying and sending coins, that conduct can be characterized as a core function within the overall fraud operation. Courts have convicted defendants on charges of aiding and abetting fraud in exactly these circumstances. The Penalties Are Severe The Act on Special Cases Concerning the Prevention of Loss Caused by Telecommunications-Based Financial Fraud (통신사기피해환급법) carries significantly heavier penalties than ordinary fraud charges. Even where losses are under 100 million KRW, a sentence of one year or more in prison is possible. Where losses exceed 500 million KRW, the sentence can range from five years to life imprisonment. Converting stolen funds into cryptocurrency and transferring them may also constitute money laundering under the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment, adding further exposure. "I Didn't Know" — How Far Does That Argument Go? The most commonly raised defense is: "I didn't know it was a voice phishing operation." Courts and investigators assess this by looking at the full picture. Whether the commission offered was unusually high Whether instructions came through Telegram, overseas numbers, or anonymous channels Whether the instructions to transfer funds and buy and send crypto were urgent and repeated Whether the person witnessed or heard anything suggesting impersonation of police or financial institutions If the circumstances were suspicious enough that a reasonable person would have questioned what was happening, and the person continued to participate anyway, the court may find constructive knowledge — making the "I didn't know" argument very difficult to sustain. If You Are Under Investigation, Act Now If you are being investigated in connection with a crypto money mule operation, getting legal counsel quickly is essential. You will need to give a detailed account of how you became involved and through whom, preserve all phone and messaging records and account information, and clearly distinguish between what you knew and what you did not know. The duration of your involvement, the number of transactions, and the total amount of funds handled will all need to be documented accurately. Decent Law Firm's digital asset team analyzes the specific circumstances and level of knowledge of each client in crypto money mule cases, maps out the scope of potential liability, and builds a practical defense strategy tailored to the facts. If you have received notice of an investigation, or if you responded to an offer and are now concerned about your exposure, please contact Decent Law Firm's digital asset team as soon as possible.
-
If You Need Assistance With a Voice Phishing (Borrowed Account) Victim Relief Application
Why Is Recovery So Difficult in Borrowed-Account Voice Phishing Cases? Telecommunications financial fraud (commonly known as “voice phishing”) typically involves transferring funds through bank accounts opened under third parties’ names (so-called fraud-use accounts). Money transferred by the victim is quickly split across multiple accounts. Some funds are withdrawn in cash or converted into virtual assets, making tracing practically impossible. If the financial institution’s payment suspension procedure is delayed, meaningful recovery becomes extremely difficult. In organized schemes, roles are divided among recruiters, cash couriers, and managers, which makes identifying legally responsible parties time-consuming. Accordingly, borrowed-account voice phishing cases are not simple financial incidents. They are serious criminal matters requiring simultaneous consideration of both criminal and civil response. Immediate Actions After the Incident Immediately apply for victim relief through the financial institution after the transfer Report to the police and initiate a formal investigation Secure account flow data and organize call and message records If response is delayed at this stage, funds will rapidly dissipate. This matter must never be taken lightly. Even a few hours can determine the outcome. After payment suspension, a claim extinguishment procedure is conducted by the financial institution and the Financial Supervisory Service, followed by a decision regarding victim refund distribution. However, if an additional victim relief application is not submitted within two months from the public notice of the claim extinguishment procedure, the victim may lose eligibility for the refund (Article 6(1) of the Act on the Prevention of Loss Caused by Telecommunications-Based Financial Fraud and Refund for Loss). Borrowed-account voice phishing cases require not only prompt initial measures but also systematic follow-up management. Why Legal Assistance Is Necessary Victims must simultaneously manage multiple response channels, including the Financial Supervisory Service, police authorities, and commercial banks. Filing a simple report is not sufficient. If the perpetrator can be identified, a civil claim for damages should be pursued in parallel. If a joint offender structure is revealed, strategies to assert joint tort liability must also be considered. Where the principal offender cannot be apprehended, it may be necessary to examine whether the account holder who provided access media, while foreseeing the fraudulent use, may bear liability for damages under tort law. However, proving the account holder’s foreseeability is essential, and liability may be limited if contributory negligence of the victim is recognized. Careful case-by-case legal analysis is therefore required. Providing practical direction to clients facing such distressing circumstances is the role of legal counsel. Attempting to navigate these procedures alone, particularly in an emotionally shaken state, can be overwhelming and complex.
