-
BlogsFront-Running in Korean Stocks: Where Does It Become Illegal? (A Complete Guide for Foreign Investors, Listed Company Executives, and Finance Professionals in Korea)
If you've been investing in Korean stocks, or working in Korea's financial industry, you've probably heard the term "front-running" (선행매매) come up more and more lately. It's not just an issue for stock YouTubers or chat-room operators. Listed company executives, fund managers, analysts, and even ordinary retail investors can find themselves caught up in it — whether as victims or, in some cases, unwitting participants. The Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) recently identified illegal activity across five YouTube channels and announced it would refer cases to prosecutors. The message is clear: the era of looking the other way is over. Here's what you need to know. 1. What Is Front-Running, Exactly? Front-running means trading on information that isn't yet public — getting in before everyone else does, and profiting when the news breaks. In the Korean market, it typically shows up in three ways. The first is the stock influencer model. A YouTuber or paid trading-room operator quietly buys shares in a stock, then recommends it publicly to subscribers. Once the price jumps, they sell. Subscribers who bought on the recommendation are left holding losses. The second is the corporate insider model. An executive or employee of a listed company learns about positive news — strong earnings, a major contract, an M&A deal — before it's disclosed, and buys shares in advance. Selling before bad news goes public to avoid losses falls into the same category. The third is the financial professional model. An analyst, fund manager, or trader uses advance knowledge of large institutional orders, upcoming research reports, or trading strategies to place personal trades ahead of the market. Under Korea's Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (FSCMA), all three can constitute illegal use of material non-public information, market manipulation, or fraudulent trading — carrying criminal penalties, fines, and disgorgement of profits. 2. What Does "Illegal" Actually Mean Here? Regulators look at three things together: the nature of the information (was it material and non-public?), the person's relationship to that information (did they have it through their job or position?), and the timing of the trade. Critically, it doesn't matter whether the trade was ultimately profitable. Using the information to trade — full stop — is the issue. Some specific situations that have drawn enforcement action in Korea include paid subscription services where operators recommended stocks they already owned, auto-trading bots sold without the required investment discretionary license, and YouTube channels providing ongoing investment advice without registering as an investment advisory business (유사투자자문업). One thing worth noting for foreign investors: Korean regulators have been actively cooperating with overseas financial authorities. Cross-border cases are no longer treated as out of reach. 3. If You're a Retail Investor: Protect Yourself The two risks individual investors face are being victimized and, less obviously, being mistaken for a participant. Paid trading rooms (리딩방) on KakaoTalk, Telegram, or Discord can look legitimate on the surface. An operator might post screenshots showing they're "buying along with you" — but in practice, they bought earlier, at a lower price, and are waiting for your money to push the price up before they exit. Warning signs include offers to share profits if you hand over account access, hints about "tomorrow's pick" designed to get you in early, and channels that charge tiered monthly fees (anything from a few thousand won to hundreds of thousands) for stock tips. If you've suffered losses through one of these schemes, the standard path in Korea is: file a complaint with the FSS (금감원 민원), assess the viability of a civil damages claim, and if the facts support it, file a criminal complaint (고소·고발). 4. If You Work at a Listed Company or Financial Firm Front-running isn't just a personal liability issue — it becomes a corporate governance failure the moment a senior employee is involved. For listed companies, a single suspicious trade by an executive can crater market trust and share price, and regulators have been clear that internal control systems will be scrutinized alongside the individual. Strengthened disclosure rules around insider transactions mean "we dealt with it internally" is no longer a viable response. For securities firms, asset managers, and other financial institutions, the exposure is higher because information access is higher. Analysts, PMs, traders, and sales staff are structurally positioned to know things before the market does — and that's precisely why the compliance burden is heavy. One enforcement action can trigger licensing risk, reputational damage, and regulatory scrutiny across the entire firm. 5. The Minimum Your Company Should Have in Place Whether you're a small listed company or a mid-sized asset manager, the logic of "we're too small to be a target" is exactly how firms end up making headlines. On internal policy, you need a written definition of material non-public information, clear procedures for how it's handled, mandatory account disclosure and trade reporting requirements for employees and related parties, and blackout periods around disclosure events. On training and attestation, key departments — finance, strategy, IR, research, sales — should receive regular compliance training. New hires and newly promoted staff should sign attestations acknowledging their obligations. On monitoring, periodic review of employee and related-party trading patterns, and sampling of trades around disclosure events, is the baseline. On incident response, you should have a documented procedure covering internal investigation authority, communication standards for dealing with the FSS, Korea Exchange, and prosecutors, and a protocol for board and audit committee reporting. If You've Been Affected — or Want to Get Ahead of the Risk For individual investors who suspect they've been the victim of a front-running scheme, we assess the facts and advise on the realistic options across criminal, civil, and regulatory channels. For listed companies and financial firms, we offer a structured review covering internal policy gaps, employee training design, and a full incident response manual — including FSS, Korea Exchange, and prosecutorial engagement. If a suspicious trade has already been flagged internally, we can advise from the investigation stage through to external response. You don't need to have everything figured out before reaching out. A brief initial consultation is enough to get a clear picture of where the risk sits.
2026-04-15 Naver Blog -
Blogs
Setting Up an SPC in Korea as a Foreign Investor — What You Need to Know
■ Why Are More Foreign Investors Using SPCs in Korea? As global capital continues to flow into Korean real estate, infrastructure, digital assets, and private equity, the use of Special Purpose Companies (SPCs) with foreign shareholders has grown significantly. Whether you are a foreign investor looking to enter the Korean market, or a Korean investor structuring offshore exposure through an overseas SPC, these vehicles have become a practical standard in cross-border investment. An SPC is essentially a project-specific legal entity designed to isolate risk and create a clean capital structure. Used correctly, it is one of the most effective tools available for managing liability, tax exposure, and exit planning across multiple jurisdictions. That said, many investors focus almost entirely on the incorporation process and overlook the regulatory, tax, and dispute risks that come with the structure — often until something goes wrong. ■ The Foreign Investment Promotion Act: What Foreign SPC Shareholders Need to Know When a foreign national establishes or participates in an SPC in Korea, the primary legal framework that applies is the Foreign Investment Promotion Act (FIPA). Here is what matters in practice. If a foreign investor acquires 10% or more of the voting shares in a Korean company — including an SPC — or exercises substantive influence through board appointments even below that threshold, the investment is classified as foreign investment under FIPA. The entity then becomes a registered foreign-invested company, subject to specific reporting obligations and post-establishment management requirements. It is also worth noting that FIPA looks beyond the immediate shareholder on record. Regulators use the concept of the Ultimate Controlling Parent (UCP) to identify who is actually behind the SPC. A layered ownership structure does not shield investors from this scrutiny. This means the question of whether your SPC will be treated as a foreign-invested company or a standard domestic entity needs to be answered — and designed for — before incorporation, not after. ■ Four Things to Check Before Setting Up a Foreign SPC First, define the legal character of the SPC clearly. Whether it is a holding company, a project company for a specific development, or an asset securitization vehicle determines which regulatory frameworks apply. In some cases, the actual funding and decision-making structure may bring the entity within the scope of collective investment or discretionary investment regulations — regardless of how it is labeled. Second, assess your FIPA reporting and registration obligations. Depending on your ownership percentage, voting rights structure, and ultimate controlling entity, your SPC may qualify as a foreign-invested company with corresponding benefits — such as tax incentives and location support — and obligations, including ongoing reporting and change notifications. Third, look at the tax picture across all relevant jurisdictions simultaneously. Structuring purely around headline tax rates is no longer sufficient. South Korea's tax authority, along with its treaty partners, applies substance requirements and BEPS principles aggressively. A structure that looks tax-efficient on paper can be unwound at audit if the SPC lacks genuine economic substance in its jurisdiction of incorporation. Fourth, put the shareholder arrangements in writing. SPCs are by nature multi-party platforms. Without a properly drafted shareholders agreement covering voting rights, dividend policy, transfer restrictions, exit mechanisms, and dispute resolution — including a clear choice of governing law and arbitration venue — even straightforward disagreements can escalate into complex cross-border litigation. ■ You Should Seek Legal Advice If Any of These Apply You are a foreign investor planning to establish or participate in a Korean SPC You are a Korean investor structuring overseas investment through a foreign SPC You are uncertain whether your current structure triggers FIPA registration requirements Your shareholder arrangements are based on a handshake understanding or a non-binding MOU You have received inquiries or document requests from a tax authority or financial regulator When issues arise in cross-border SPC structures, they rarely stay contained to one jurisdiction. Regulatory scrutiny, tax reassessment, and shareholder disputes can surface simultaneously across multiple countries. Early legal review is significantly less costly than managing a dispute after the fact. ■ How Decent Law Firm Can Help Decent Law Firm's International Legal and Virtual Asset Team advises on the full lifecycle of SPC structures involving foreign investors — from initial structuring and jurisdiction selection, to FIPA compliance, shareholder agreement drafting, tax risk assessment, and dispute resolution. If you are considering establishing an SPC in Korea, participating as a foreign shareholder in an existing structure, or simply want to know whether your current setup is legally sound, we are happy to help you work through it.
2026-04-14 Naver Blog -
Blogs
Korea FSS Cracks Down on Finfluencers: What KOLs Need to Know About Legal Risk
Korea's Financial Regulator Is Now Actively Targeting Finfluencers Korea's Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) has confirmed illegal activity across five YouTube channels offering paid stock recommendations and automated trading programs, and has announced it will refer the operators for criminal investigation. The finfluencer and KOL market in Korea has effectively entered a period of full regulatory scrutiny. Four of the five channels identified were found to have provided investment advice and recommendations without registering as quasi-investment advisory businesses, in potential violation of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (FSCMA). Three of them charged tiered subscription fees ranging from approximately $2 to $450 per month for stock analysis and picks, while a fourth recommended entry and exit timing for leveraged U.S. ETFs. A fifth operator was flagged for selling an automated stock trading program without the required investment discretionary business license. The FSS has stated it will refer unregistered financial investment operators for criminal investigation and has indicated that front-running and other market manipulation activities will be pursued by its special judicial police unit. Legal Risks by Service Type ① Quasi-Investment Advisory Registration Risk (Paid Recommendations & Tip Services) If you operate a paid stock tip channel or recommendation service and collect regular subscription fees or tiered membership dues, your business may be subject to quasi-investment advisory registration requirements under the FSCMA. Describing your content as "information sharing" does not provide legal protection — regulators assess how the service actually functions. ② Unlicensed Investment Discretionary Business Risk (Automated Trading Bots & Signals) If your automated trading bot or signal service effectively executes or directs trades on behalf of subscribers, it may fall within the scope of investment discretionary business, which requires a formal license. As this latest crackdown demonstrates, operating without the required license carries serious criminal exposure. ③ Front-Running and Undisclosed Advertising Risk Recommending products or securities while in an undisclosed paid or sponsored relationship may violate both advertising disclosure laws and FSCMA investment solicitation rules. Recommending securities you already hold with the intent to sell after the price rises can constitute market manipulation, and the FSS has made clear it intends to pursue these cases aggressively. If Any of These Apply to You, Your Business May Already Be at Risk You should seek legal advice immediately if any of the following describe your situation. You operate a paid stock recommendation or tip service You sell or license an automated trading bot or signal subscription You have affiliate or sponsorship relationships with ETF, crypto, or platform providers but your disclosure practices are unclear You have seen a recent increase in refund requests or customer complaints You have received any inquiry or document request from a financial regulator or investigative authority Once a referral for criminal investigation is initiated, the consequences — channel suspension, account freezes, and criminal liability — can materialize simultaneously. A brief legal review now can prevent a far larger problem later. 5 Things You Should Review Right Now First, clarify the legal classification of your business. Whether your service constitutes simple information provision, quasi-investment advisory, or investment discretionary business has significant legal consequences — and the answer depends on how your service actually operates, not how it is labeled. Second, review your Terms of Service, disclaimer language, and product descriptions for compliance with the FSCMA, the E-Commerce Act, and the Act on Regulation of Terms and Conditions. A generic disclaimer stating that users are responsible for their own investment decisions is not sufficient protection. Third, establish internal guidelines for advertising, sponsorship, and affiliate disclosures. Conflict of interest disclosure standards and revenue-sharing transparency should be defined at the content planning stage, not added as an afterthought. Fourth, if you operate a paid community on Telegram, KakaoTalk, or Discord, document the permitted scope of content, as well as your refund and cancellation process. Clear internal rules significantly reduce the risk of disputes and regulatory complaints. Fifth, build pre-launch legal review into your routine before releasing new services, changing your fee structure, or entering into significant partnerships. Decent Law Firm's Virtual Asset Team Is Here to Help Finfluencer and KOL businesses sit at the intersection of content regulation, marketing law, community management, investment advisory rules, and platform compliance. Managing these risks requires a perspective that spans financial regulation, capital markets law, platform liability, and criminal exposure — general contract review alone is not enough. Decent Law Firm's Virtual Asset Team provides tailored legal services covering business structure assessment, compliant model design, Terms of Service and advertising guideline review, and dispute and investigation response. If you are uncertain whether your current business structure is legally sound, contact Decent Law Firm today.
2026-04-13 Naver Blog -
Blogs
Why AI Startups in Korea Need IT Legal Counsel
Before you build, make sure your service is structured to survive legally — not just technically. The Best Time for Legal Advice Is Before You Launch Getting an AI model up and running, connecting APIs, and opening a beta service can happen surprisingly fast. But building a service that is legally sustainable — one that properly addresses data use, privacy, copyright, and liability — is an entirely different challenge. Legal counsel is most effective not after development, but at the service planning and data architecture stage. A last-minute terms review before launch is a patch, not a solution. The following questions need to be answered before you write a single line of code. What data can you legally collect, store, and use for training? Is it legally safe to use customer data for model fine-tuning? Who owns the copyright to AI-generated outputs, and who is liable when things go wrong? Building a service without addressing these questions means going to market with structural vulnerabilities already baked in. 3 Regulatory Risks Every AI Startup in Korea Must Address As of 2026, the regulatory environment for AI startups operating in Korea has crystallized around three key areas. First, Korea's AI Basic Act is now in effect, introducing formal requirements around explainability, safety, and accountability for AI services. Second, the Personal Information Protection Commission has introduced punitive fines and class action mechanisms, making data incidents an existential risk rather than a compliance footnote. Third, when your infrastructure combines third-party AI APIs with cloud and SaaS tools, failing to clearly define terms, licensing boundaries, and liability exposure means that in any dispute, the startup absorbs all the risk while platform providers walk away unaffected. If Any of These Apply to You, Get Legal Advice Now You should seek IT legal counsel if you are in any of the following situations. You are designing a data collection or AI training pipeline for a new service You are providing B2B white-label or custom solutions built on third-party AI APIs Your Terms of Service or Privacy Policy do not accurately reflect how your service actually works Your B2B contracts have unclear SLA terms, liability caps, or IP ownership provisions You have already launched but feel uncertain about your data, contract, or terms structure The assumption that "we can fix it after launch" is a costly one. The larger your service grows, the more expensive and disruptive it becomes to restructure the legal foundation underneath it. How Decent Law Firm's Corporate Legal Team Works Decent Law Firm goes beyond reviewing contracts and terms in isolation. We take an integrated approach — examining your service architecture, data flows, and business model together to identify and address legal risks before they become problems. Service structure and data flow analysis AI, privacy, and contract risk mapping Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and internal policy review B2B and SaaS contract structure design Legal structuring for investment readiness and international expansion If you are building an AI service or have already launched but are uncertain about your legal structure, contact Decent Law Firm today.
2026-04-10 Naver Blog -
Blogs
Drug-Impaired Driving in Korea: Up to 5 Years in Prison and KRW 20 Million Fine
1. What Constitutes Drug-Impaired Driving? Under Korean law, drug-impaired driving is not penalized simply for taking medication. The key issue is whether the driver’s ability was impaired at the time of driving. Relevant substances include not only illegal drugs but also commonly prescribed medications such as: Sleeping pills (e.g., zolpidem) Anesthetics (e.g., propofol) Certain psychiatric or cold medications Authorities focus on actual driving behavior—lane deviation, delayed reactions, or abnormal driving patterns can lead to criminal charges. 2. Increased Penalties as of 2026 Recent amendments to Korean traffic laws significantly increased penalties. Basic offense → Up to 5 years imprisonment or a fine up to KRW 20 million If an accident occurs → Injury: 1 to 15 years imprisonment → Death: Minimum 3 years or life imprisonment In serious cases, drug-impaired driving may be treated similarly to dangerous driving causing injury or death, resulting in severe sentencing. 3. Refusal to Test or Prescription Drugs Are Not Safe Defenses Police may request saliva or blood tests during enforcement. Refusal without valid reason results in the same level of punishment. Test refusal → Up to 5 years imprisonment or KRW 20 million fine Importantly, having a prescription does not exempt liability. The legal standard is impairment, not legality of the drug. Key factors include: Type of substance Dosage and timing Actual driving condition Medical advice regarding driving 4. Early Legal Strategy Is Critical Drug-impaired driving cases require more than simple admission or denial. The outcome largely depends on how the facts are structured and presented. At Decent Law Firm, we provide: Detailed analysis of medication history and medical records Pre-investigation statement strategy Sentencing mitigation and settlement planning Medical opinions and supporting evidence Early intervention can significantly impact the final outcome. 5. Legal Consultation If you are under investigation for drug-impaired driving in Korea, it is essential to establish a clear legal strategy from the outset. Decent Law Firm offers specialized criminal defense with a combined medical and legal approach.
2026-04-07 Naver Blog -
Blogs
Litigation for the Payment of Goods: Reclaiming What Your Business is Owed
Doing business in a foreign country comes with its own set of challenges, and one of the most frustrating is dealing with clients who refuse to pay for goods already delivered. If your business partner in Korea is constantly delaying payment, it may be time to move beyond simple reminders and consider Litigation for the Payment of Goods (물품대금소송). At Decent Law Firm, we help international entrepreneurs and entities navigate the Korean legal system to recover what they are owed before the statute of limitations expires. Litigation for Unpaid Goods: What You Need to Know A "Litigation for Payment of Goods" is a civil lawsuit filed when a buyer fails to pay for supplied goods by the agreed-upon deadline. To win, you must prove through documentation that a transaction occurred and that a valid debt exists. Key Evidence Required: Proof of Agreement: Contracts, Purchase Orders (PO), or approved Quotations. Proof of Delivery: Delivery slips, Invoices, Bills of Lading, or signed confirmation of receipt. Proof of Debt: Tax invoices, bank statements showing partial payments (or lack thereof), and records of payment demands (emails, texts, or KakaoTalk messages). Note for Expatriate Businesses: In Korea, long-term business relationships often operate on verbal agreements or customary practices rather than formal contracts. If you don't have a formal contract, don't lose hope. Tax invoices, transaction patterns, and messaging logs are powerful substitutes in a Korean court. The Ticking Clock: Statute of Limitations In Korea, commercial claims for the payment of goods are generally subject to a short-term statute of limitations of 3 years. If you take no legal action—such as sending a Content Certification (Certified Mail), filing a lawsuit, or applying for a Provisional Attachment—the time continues to run. Simply "waiting for a few more weeks" at the debtor's request could lead to your legal right to claim the money expiring entirely. Common Defenses Used by Debtors In the courtroom, debtors rarely just say, "I don't have the money." Instead, they often use calculated legal defenses to avoid payment: "The goods were defective, and we agreed on a return/discount." "The delivered quantity was different from the order." "The debt was already settled through a separate transaction (offsetting/set-off)." To counter these claims, you need a meticulous legal review. We reconstruct the entire transaction history—from the initial order to the payment delays—to logically prove your right to the full amount. Decent Law Firm’s Strategy for Actual Recovery A court judgment is just a piece of paper if the debtor has already emptied their bank accounts. Our Civil Litigation Team focuses on actual recovery, not just winning the case. Timeline Structuring: We organize the contract, order, delivery, and settlement flow into a clear, structural timeline. Evidence Optimization: We select the most "court-friendly" evidence to minimize the risk of a counter-defense. Asset Preservation: We check the necessity of Provisional Attachments (가압류) on the debtor’s bank accounts or property to ensure funds are available once we win. Strategic Negotiation: Often, the mere filing of a professionally drafted lawsuit by a reputable firm prompts the debtor to settle immediately. Don't Wait Until It's Too Late If you’ve heard "Please wait a little longer" one too many times, it’s time to protect your interests. Gather your contracts, invoices, and messaging logs, and reach out for a professional consultation. Your partner for legal success in Korea, Decent Law Firm Civil Litigation Team
2026-04-06 Naver Blog
