We Resolve Legal Matters
How can we assist you?
Blogs
MoreEU Data Act and Data Clauses in IoT Supply Agreements
Reviewing the data holder role, allocation of design costs, unfair contractual terms, and trade secret protectionThe EU Data Act has applied since September 12, 2025. It grants users of connected products a right to access the data those products generate and regulates unfair contractual terms in data agreements between businesses. Korean manufacturers supplying devices to the EU market need to revisit how data-related roles and responsibilities are allocated in their supply and distribution agreements with EU partners.Devices placed on the EU market after September 12, 2026 are subject to a design obligation premised on user data access, and the unfair terms rules may apply from September 12, 2027 to long-term agreements concluded before September 12, 2025. This article summarizes the key clauses to review in supply agreements.1. Impact of the Data Act on Supply AgreementsThe Data Act applies to connected products placed on the EU market and to related services. Even if the manufactur
Workplace Harassment Lawyer: Why You Need to Act Before It's Too Late
What Does Workplace Harassment Mean Under the Law? Under Korea's Labor Standards Act, workplace harassment refers to conduct in which an employer or employee uses a position or relationship of superiority in the workplace to inflict physical or mental suffering on another employee, or to worsen the working environment, beyond the appropriate scope of work. Verbal abuse, ostracism, and unfair exclusion from work all qualify as harassment Employers must investigate promptly upon receiving a report Retaliating against a reporting employee carries a penalty of up to 3 years in prison or a fine of up to KRW 30 million Because the legal requirements and procedures are clearly defined, it is important to work with an attorney experienced in workplace harassment cases to organize the facts of your situation. From Reporting to Remedy: What Is the Process? Internal report — Filed with the HR department or a reporting center Fact-finding investigation — Conducted objectively by the employer Corre
The CATFI Rug Pull Case and Unfair Trading Under Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act
Meme coins often attract investors because they can be launched relatively quickly and may experience sharp price increases within a short period. Decentralized exchanges, or DEXs, facilitate trades through smart contracts and automated protocols rather than a centralized order-matching system. Once a token has been issued, trading can begin by creating a liquidity pool without going through the formal listing review typically required by a centralized exchange. This structure can attract investors seeking early exposure to newly launched tokens. At the same time, there has been growing concern over so-called rug pulls, in which project operators use false or misleading information to drive up the price of a token and then sell their holdings all at once. In May 2026, the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office indicted individuals involved in the issuance of the meme coin CATFI on charges including violations of Korea’s Act on the Protection of Virtual Asset Users. Prosecutors all
False Naver Blog Posts Targeting Your Business in Korea: How to Request Removal
When Online Defamation Affects Your Business in Korea In South Korea, Naver remains one of the most influential online platforms for search, blogs, and reputation management. For businesses operating in Korea, what appears on Naver can directly affect customer trust, business inquiries, and brand credibility. In recent years, some businesses have discovered Naver blog posts that mention their company or brand name together with words such as “scam,” “fraud,” or “victim warning.” These posts may appear professional and persuasive, even when the underlying facts are inaccurate, misleading, or unrelated to the business itself. For foreign-owned companies or international businesses operating in Korea, this type of reputational damage can be especially difficult to detect and respond to. The content may be written in Korean, indexed on Naver, and viewed as credible by local customers before the company becomes aware of it. Under the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Networ
Crypto Signal Group Refunds in Korea: A Lawyer’s 4-Step Strategy (Watch for Recovery Scams)
Why is it so hard to get a refund from crypto signal groups? Many “signal groups” on Telegram or KakaoTalk advertise “principal guaranteed” or “monthly returns of X%.” However, their terms usually include broad disclaimers such as “all investment decisions are the user’s responsibility.” They also label their signals as “for reference only,” which is often used to avoid liability. In practice, some of these operations may involve: Unlicensed investment advisory services Profit-sharing structures that may trigger regulatory violations Potential issues under Korean laws on fraud, quasi-receipt of funds, or capital markets regulations For this reason, crypto signal group disputes are not just civil refund claims—they often involve criminal law considerations as well. Before pursuing a refund, check this first From our experience at Decent Law Firm’s Digital Asset Team, the key factor is not how much you invested, but how you were induced to join and how the service was structured. That
Illegal Investment Advisory Fraud in Korea: The Longer You Wait, the Less Likely You Are to Recover Your Money
Reports of fraud involving unlicensed investment advisory services — operating through KakaoTalk group chats, Telegram channels, and YouTube — are increasing rapidly. What appears on the surface to be legitimate investment advice is frequently a structure in which an unregistered operator collects high fees while generating losses for clients. When fraud of this kind occurs, failing to pursue both criminal complaint and civil recovery strategy from the outset means that with every passing day, the money, the evidence, and the perpetrators become harder to find. When Does Unlicensed Investment Advisory Become a Legal Problem? Unlicensed investment advisory services differ from properly registered advisory firms in that they provide investment information to an unspecified number of people through standardized channels in exchange for payment. The problem arises when operators go beyond this — effectively directing specific buy and sell decisions on individual stocks — without any lice
