We Resolve Legal Matters
How can we assist you?
Blogs
More-
Emergency Arrest in Korea: What Actually Happens in the First 48 Hours
The moment you're placed under emergency arrest in Korea, the clock starts. And it doesn't stop. Under Article 200-4 of the Korean Code of Criminal Procedure, investigators have exactly 48 hours from the time of arrest to apply for a detention warrant — or they must release you immediately. Every decision made inside that window has consequences that follow the case long after. Stage 1 · Immediate Arrest and Transfer to the Detention Facility At the moment of arrest, the arresting officer is required to inform you of your identity, the grounds for arrest, your right to retain a lawyer, and your right to remain silent. You'll then be transported to the nearest police station and placed in a holding cell. Once inside, the intake process begins: identity verification, personal belongings search and storage, and formal admission into custody. Two things matter most at this stage: Whether you can contact a family member When and how you can meet with a lawyer This is the single most critical moment to get legal counsel involved. In practice, the first attorney visit and formal retention often happen within hours of arrival at the holding facility — and for good reason. Stage 2 · Waiting in Custody and the First Interrogation At some point during the same day or the next, you'll be brought out for your first formal interrogation by investigators. In this compressed window, police are working fast — pulling together your statements, seized materials, and witness accounts to build a picture of whether charges are warranted and whether continued detention is necessary. What makes this stage particularly consequential is that the written interrogation record produced here often feeds directly into the detention warrant application and the subsequent warrant hearing before a judge. How much you say, what you say, and where you invoke your right to silence can significantly shape the direction of the entire case. Stage 3 · The Detention Warrant Decision If police determine that continued detention is necessary, they must submit a detention warrant request to prosecutors within 48 hours of the arrest. Prosecutors review the request and decide whether to seek the warrant from a judge. Miss the deadline, or fail to secure the warrant — and the suspect must be released immediately, no exceptions. During this window, the two sides are moving in opposite directions: Investigators are assembling evidence of the alleged offense and building the case for why detention is necessary Defense counsel is gathering evidence of stable ties to the community — residence, employment, family — and arguing that flight risk and evidence tampering concerns don't hold up Stage 4 · The Warrant Review Hearing and What Comes Next If prosecutors apply for a detention warrant, the suspect is brought before a judge for a warrant review hearing — known in Korea as the yeongjangsiljilsimsa. The judge evaluates three things: how well the alleged offense is substantiated, whether there's a genuine risk of flight or evidence tampering, and whether the investigation can reasonably proceed without detention. The outcome falls into one of three categories: Warrant granted → The suspect is remanded into custody at a correctional facility Warrant denied → Immediate release; investigation continues without detention No warrant filed within 48 hours → Immediate release, no further action required at that stage Decent Law Firm — Criminal Defense Practice The first 48 hours after an emergency arrest move fast, and the decisions made during that window — what to say, what not to say, what to prepare — shape everything that follows. Our criminal defense team covers the full sequence: from the first attorney visit at the holding facility, through the interrogation stage, to the warrant hearing before the judge. We focus on getting in front of unfavorable outcomes before they solidify, and staying in your corner until the end.
-
Referral Marketing: Outcomes Depend on How It Is Conducted
Referral Marketing Is Not Always Illegal Referral marketing originates from the basic marketing concept of “recommendation.” If a service or platform is introduced on a one-time basis and a reward is received accordingly, it may be assessed as legitimate promotional activity. However, referral marketing may raise legal issues if it operates in any of the following ways: A structure in which profits are generated step-by-step and on a continuing basis depending on the referrer’s performance in recruiting downstream members or their trading results; or Monetary transactions occur without any genuine exchange of goods or services; or Funds are solicited while guaranteeing high returns. In such cases, legal issues may arise under the Act on Door-to-Door Sales, etc. (including multi-level marketing or sponsored door-to-door sales), the Act on the Regulation of Conducting Fund-Raising Business without Permission, or criminal fraud provisions. The key point is that even when the same label—“referral marketing”—is used, legal evaluation can vary significantly depending on how the operation is actually structured. In legal assessments, the crucial factors include whether rewards are paid in stages based on downstream recruitment or trading performance, whether there is a genuine transaction of goods or services, and whether the individual was substantively involved in member recruitment and management. Key Factors That May Lead Referral Marketing to Criminal Liability Whether referral marketing leads to legal sanctions is not determined by a single factor. During investigations and trials, authorities comprehensively examine the following elements: Nature of the Revenue Structure Whether compensation is merely a sign-up bonus, or whether differentiated rewards are paid based on downstream recruitment results, trading volume, or organizational hierarchy, is a critical consideration. The more the structure resembles performance-linked compensation rather than simple referrals, the higher the likelihood of legal scrutiny. Repetition and Continuity of Conduct Authorities assess whether the activity was a one-time introduction or whether the same member recruitment activities were repeated over a long period. Under the Act on Door-to-Door Sales, whether an activity is conducted “as a business” is determined by considering repetition, continuity, and profit motive together. Degree of Involvement After User Acquisition Beyond merely providing a sign-up link, it is important whether the individual substantively participated in explaining the business structure or compensation scheme, recruiting or managing downstream members, or handling inquiries and complaints. If such involvement is established, the scope of liability may expand. Role and Function Within the Overall Structure Regardless of formal titles, authorities comprehensively review the actual functions and roles performed within the organization, such as member recruitment, business explanations or training, downstream organization management, and commission payments. Common Misconceptions in Referral Marketing Cases One of the most common misconceptions is the belief that liability can be avoided simply because the individual did not directly hold or handle funds. However, in cases involving multi-level marketing or sponsored door-to-door sales, authorities focus less on fund custody and more on: The individual’s substantive role within the organization The degree of involvement in member recruitment and management The extent of contribution to operating the compensation structure Another frequent misunderstanding is that using overseas platforms or foreign entities automatically avoids the application of Korean law. In reality, if members are recruited in Korea, business structures are explained to Korean users, or compensation is paid domestically, Korean laws—including the Act on Door-to-Door Sales—may still apply, regardless of the platform’s or entity’s location. Some also believe that modifying the structure or deleting related materials after issues arise will eliminate legal liability. However, in matters involving multi-level marketing or sponsored door-to-door sales, legal responsibility is assessed based on the structure and conduct at the time the acts occurred. Post hoc structural changes or document deletions do not extinguish liability for already completed offenses and may instead give rise to additional legal issues, such as destruction of evidence under Article 155 of the Criminal Act. Decent’s Approach: What to Review Now in Referral Marketing Matters In referral marketing cases, early-stage organization and assessment directly influence future legal outcomes. In particular, the following points should be carefully reviewed: Differentiating roles by specific acts and time periods Organizing facts based on substance rather than form Setting a response strategy before the scope of liability is fixed Understanding how early 대응 impacts final outcomes Referral marketing may appear, on the surface, to be a simple promotional activity. However, actual legal judgments are always based on structure, role, and degree of involvement. Many individuals later find themselves overwhelmed with anxiety, thinking, “I didn’t realize it could become this serious.” If the issue is taken lightly or postponed, it may lead to unexpected legal liability, which should never be ignored. Because it is essential to accurately identify the structure, clarify roles by timeline, and establish a response strategy suited to the current situation, we strongly recommend conducting an early, expert-level review of your circumstances.
