-
Blogs Corporate & BizM&A Legal Due Diligence Costs and Scope in Korea: A Practical Guide
The cost of M&A legal due diligence is not simply a lawyer’s fee. It depends on the size of the transaction, the complexity of the target company, and the scope of the review itself. For foreign companies and investors entering the Korean market, understanding how legal due diligence works is critical because the findings can directly affect pricing, indemnity structures, and even whether the transaction proceeds at all. What Is Legal Due Diligence in an M&A Transaction? Legal due diligence (LDD) is the process of identifying and reviewing the legal risks of a target company before completing an acquisition or investment. In Korea, legal due diligence is typically conducted after the signing of an LOI (Letter of Intent) and before the execution of the SPA (Share Purchase Agreement). Key review areas usually include: Material contracts and commercial arrangements Litigation and disputes Employment and labor issues Regulatory compliance Intellectual property rights Corporate governance and shareholder structure Licenses and permits Subsidiaries and overseas entities The purpose is not simply to “find problems,” but to assess legal exposure that may transfer to the buyer after closing. The results of due diligence often directly influence: Purchase price adjustments Representations & warranties (R&W) Indemnification clauses Escrow arrangements Closing conditions Deal restructuring decisions What Determines M&A Legal Due Diligence Costs? There is no fixed pricing standard for legal due diligence in Korea. Costs are generally determined by several combined factors. 1. Transaction Size Larger transactions typically involve: Broader review scope Higher legal exposure Increased reporting requirements More intensive negotiation support Cross-border transactions and strategic acquisitions usually require deeper review compared to early-stage investments. 2. Complexity of the Target Company Costs increase when the target company has: Multiple subsidiaries Overseas entities Large numbers of commercial contracts Regulated business operations Complex shareholder arrangements Convertible securities, SAFE, or stock option structures Industries such as fintech, crypto, healthcare, SaaS, and platform businesses often require additional regulatory analysis. 3. Scope of Due Diligence The scope of review is one of the biggest cost variables. • Full Scope Due Diligence A full-scope review examines the overall legal condition of the company in detail. This is commonly used in: Strategic acquisitions Large-scale M&A deals Transactions involving operational integration (PMI) While more expensive and time-consuming, it can significantly reduce post-closing legal risks. • Red Flag Due Diligence A red-flag review focuses only on major legal risks that could materially affect the transaction. This approach is often used by: Financial investors Venture capital firms Early-stage investors Buyers operating under tight timelines It is generally faster and less expensive, but risks outside the agreed review scope may remain unidentified. How Are Legal Due Diligence Fees Structured? In practice, Korean law firms usually structure due diligence fees in one of three ways. Hourly Billing Fees are calculated based on: Time spent Hourly rates of lawyers involved This model is commonly used when the review scope may change during the transaction. Fixed Fee A fixed fee is agreed upon based on: Defined review scope Estimated timeline Expected workload This structure offers budget predictability but may require additional fees if the scope expands later. Hybrid Structure Many mid-to-large transactions use a hybrid model: Base scope under a fixed fee Additional work billed hourly This approach balances flexibility with cost predictability. Data Room Preparation Also Affects Costs The quality of document organization can significantly impact due diligence efficiency. Well-structured VDRs (Virtual Data Rooms) reduce: Review time Additional document requests Follow-up interviews Reporting delays Poorly organized materials often increase both costs and transaction risks. Importantly, legal advisors can only assess documents actually provided to them. Missing or incomplete disclosures may limit the scope of legal responsibility and the reliability of the review itself. Why Due Diligence Findings Matter Legal due diligence findings can materially change the transaction structure. Purchase Price Adjustments Material legal risks may justify: Lower valuations Deferred payments Escrow retention Representation & Warranty Negotiations Discovered risks are often reflected in: Disclosure schedules Liability caps Survival periods Basket thresholds Specific indemnities Deal Restructuring or Termination Serious legal issues may lead to: Changes in acquisition structure Asset deals instead of share deals Conditional closing arrangements Transaction termination Proper Scope Design Is Critical One of the most common problems in M&A transactions is starting due diligence without clearly defining the review scope. When the scope is unclear: Costs become unpredictable Timelines expand Review items continue increasing Negotiations become inefficient A properly structured process usually follows this order: Define review scope Discuss fees and timeline Execute engagement agreement Open VDR and begin review Deliver due diligence report Reflect findings in SPA negotiations Legal due diligence should not be evaluated solely based on price. The more important question is whether the legal team can accurately identify transaction-critical risks and translate them into practical deal protections. Decent Law Firm advises domestic and international clients on M&A transactions, startup investments, cross-border acquisitions, and regulatory risk analysis in Korea. If you are considering an acquisition or investment in Korea and would like to discuss an appropriate due diligence scope and fee structure, our corporate advisory team would be happy to assist.
2026-05-11 Naver Blog -
Blogs Crypto
Crypto Romance Scams in Korea: Fake Exchanges and Investment Fraud You Should Watch Out For
If someone you met through social media suddenly encourages you to invest in cryptocurrency through a private platform or “exclusive opportunity,” there is a high chance it could be a romance scam. In recent years, crypto-related romance scams have become increasingly sophisticated in Korea and globally. Instead of directly asking victims for money, scammers now build emotional trust first and then lure victims into fake cryptocurrency exchanges or fraudulent overseas investment platforms. Because digital assets can be transferred and laundered quickly across borders, fast legal action and evidence preservation are critical once suspicious activity is identified. What Is a Crypto Romance Scam? A romance scam is a type of fraud where scammers build emotional relationships online through platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, KakaoTalk, or dating apps, and then exploit that trust for financial gain. Recently, these scams have evolved into cryptocurrency investment fraud schemes involving fake exchanges and manipulated trading platforms. Scammers often pretend to be: Overseas professionals or business owners Wealthy investors Crypto traders or financial experts Individuals interested in a long-term relationship Rather than immediately discussing investments, they usually spend days or weeks building emotional intimacy and trust. Once the victim becomes emotionally attached, the scammer introduces a “special investment opportunity” or claims they can help generate high returns through crypto trading. In many cases, victims are initially allowed to withdraw small amounts of money to create the illusion that the platform is legitimate. The Typical 5-Step Structure of a Crypto Romance Scam 1. Initial Contact Through Social Media or Dating Apps Scammers approach victims through Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, KakaoTalk, or international dating platforms using fake profiles designed to appear trustworthy and successful. 2. Building Emotional Trust They communicate consistently and intensively, sharing personal stories and emotional conversations to create psychological closeness. At this stage, investment discussions are usually minimized. 3. Introducing Cryptocurrency Investments Once trust has been established, the scammer begins sharing screenshots of trading profits or investment success stories. Victims are often told things like: “This is for our future together.” “I want to help you make money too.” “This opportunity is only available to a few people.” 4. Moving the Victim to a Fake Exchange The victim may first purchase cryptocurrency through a legitimate exchange before being directed to a separate “high-return platform” or overseas exchange controlled by the scammers. The platform may display fake profits and even allow limited withdrawals initially to gain further trust. 5. Withdrawal Refusal and Additional Deposit Requests Once larger amounts are invested, the victim is suddenly unable to withdraw funds. The scammers then demand additional payments for: Taxes Security deposits Verification fees Unlocking accounts Anti-money laundering clearance When the victim refuses or becomes suspicious, communication is cut off and the website often disappears entirely. Why Victims Often Lose Significant Amounts Most crypto romance scams begin with relatively small investments. However, repeated emotional manipulation and fabricated profit displays often lead victims to invest life savings, loans, retirement funds, or borrowed money. Many victims delay reporting the scam because they emotionally trust the scammer or feel embarrassed about the situation. Secondary scams are also common. After the initial fraud, victims may be contacted by fake “recovery companies” promising to retrieve lost cryptocurrency in exchange for upfront fees. If a company or individual requests advance payment without clear professional credentials, caution is strongly advised. What You Should Do If You Become a Victim ✔️ Stop Sending Additional Funds Immediately Claims such as “You must deposit more money to unlock withdrawals” are common scam tactics. Do not make additional transfers under any circumstances. ✔️ Preserve All Evidence The following materials can become critical evidence during investigations and legal proceedings: Social media profiles and usernames Telegram, KakaoTalk, or direct message conversations Wallet addresses and transaction records Screenshots of the trading platform Exchange URLs and account details Bank transfer records ✔️ Seek Legal Assistance Quickly Cryptocurrency-related fraud cases often involve rapid fund movement, overseas transfers, and money laundering structures. Early legal review can help victims preserve evidence, prepare criminal complaints, and establish an effective legal strategy with investigative authorities. You Do Not Have to Handle a Crypto Romance Scam Alone Crypto romance scams are highly organized financial crimes that exploit emotional trust and psychological vulnerability. If you suspect fraudulent activity or have already suffered losses, it is important to seek professional legal guidance as early as possible. The Digital Asset Team at Decent Law Firm provides practical legal strategies covering transaction analysis, evidence preservation, and criminal investigation matters related to cryptocurrency fraud. Lawyers with experience in digital asset disputes and crypto-related investigations can help review the most appropriate legal options for your situation.
2026-05-08 Naver Blog -
Blogs Criminal
Real Estate Presale Scams in Korea: Warning Signs You Should Never Ignore
“Congratulations, you’ve been selected for a special apartment presale.” If you recently received a call, text message, or KakaoTalk message like this in Korea, it may not be a legitimate housing offer — it could be a sophisticated real estate voice phishing scam. In recent years, scams involving apartment presale rights (“bunyang rights”) have become increasingly advanced. Fraudsters now impersonate developers, sales agencies, financial institutions, and even public organizations while using fake websites, forged contracts, and manipulated caller IDs to appear legitimate. For foreigners living in or investing in Korea, these scams can be particularly confusing because the Korean real estate subscription and presale system is already complex. This article explains the most common types of Korean apartment presale scams and what to do if you become a victim. Why Apartment Presale Scams in Korea Are So Convincing Real estate presale scams in Korea typically involve fraudsters contacting victims through phone calls, text messages, messaging apps, or fake websites in order to steal deposits or personal information. These scams are difficult to identify because they often imitate actual Korean apartment subscription and presale procedures. Scammers frequently: Use the names of real apartment complexes currently under development Impersonate legitimate developers or sales agencies Create fake Korean real estate websites and contracts Manipulate caller ID information Offer “urgent” discounted presale rights far below market price Many victims only realize they were scammed after funds have already been transferred. 3 Common Types of Korean Presale Fraud 1. Fake Subscription Winner Scam Victims receive messages claiming they were selected for a “special supply” apartment opportunity or priority subscription allocation. The scammer then demands advance payments for: document processing fees priority reservation fees subscription maintenance fees special allocation deposits In legitimate Korean apartment subscription procedures, these kinds of payments are generally not requested through personal bank accounts. If someone asks you to transfer money to an individual account, you should treat it as a major warning sign. 2. “Cheap Presale Rights” Deposit Scam Scammers advertise apartment presale rights at prices significantly below market value and pressure victims to send deposits quickly. They often claim: “This is an urgent resale” “The seller needs immediate cash” “The deal expires today” After receiving the deposit or premium payment, the scammer disappears. This type of fraud is increasingly common in Korea’s online real estate communities and messaging platforms. 3. Fake Developer or Sales Agency Impersonation Some scammers create highly convincing fake sales channels using the names of actual apartment projects currently under construction. They may provide: fake contracts forged official documents cloned websites fake customer service numbers Before making any payment, you should independently verify: the official developer website company registration details official contact numbers payment account ownership actual apartment subscription announcements What To Do If You Sent Money Step 1. Request Immediate Payment Suspension If you transferred money, contact your bank immediately and request a payment suspension or fraud report. Time is critical in Korean voice phishing cases. In many situations, the first 24 hours are the most important for preventing withdrawal or further transfer of funds. Step 2. Preserve Evidence You should immediately save and back up all relevant materials, including: text messages KakaoTalk conversations call records and recordings bank transfer receipts contracts or documents received screenshots of websites and profiles Digital evidence can disappear quickly, especially in messaging applications. Step 3. Report the Case to Korean Authorities Victims can report the incident through: the Korean Cyber Crime Reporting System (ECRM) local police stations in Korea Providing organized evidence from the beginning can significantly affect how quickly the investigation progresses. Step 4. Review Civil and Criminal Legal Options Depending on the case, additional legal actions may include: criminal complaints for fraud account freezing or provisional seizure applications civil damage claims tracing related accounts and accomplices Actual recovery possibilities vary depending on the remaining account balance, fund movement, and whether organized fraud groups are involved. Fast Legal Action Matters in Korean Real Estate Fraud Cases Many victims delay reporting because they hope the transaction may still be legitimate. Unfortunately, scammers often use that hesitation to move or withdraw funds before legal action begins. Apartment presale fraud cases in Korea require fast evidence preservation and immediate legal action to improve the chances of recovery. If you are unsure whether the situation qualifies as fraud, it is still important to seek legal review as early as possible. Decent Law Firm advises both Korean and foreign clients on Korean voice phishing, real estate fraud, and financial crime matters, including early-stage reporting, evidence organization, criminal complaints, and asset recovery strategy.
2026-05-06 Naver Blog -
Blogs Crypto
2026 AML Reform in Korea: 3 Key Anti-Money Laundering Obligations Under the Revised FSCMA
The amended Korean Anti-Money Laundering law is no longer just a compliance issue for banks. It is rapidly becoming a core operational and governance issue for virtual asset businesses, fintech companies, and even certain professional service providers. The revised Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information (commonly referred to as Korea’s AML law or “Special Financial Transactions Act”) was promulgated on February 19, 2026, and is scheduled to take effect on August 20, 2026. The amendments significantly strengthen AML obligations for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) and expand the overall compliance framework surrounding crypto-related transactions in Korea. This article outlines the three most important AML changes businesses should understand before the new rules take effect. What Is Korea’s “Special Financial Transactions Act” (특금법)? Korea’s AML framework is governed by the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, which establishes reporting, monitoring, and internal control obligations designed to prevent: Money laundering Terrorist financing Illicit use of financial systems Under this framework, financial institutions and VASPs must identify suspicious transactions, verify customer information, maintain records, and implement internal AML controls. In practical terms, the law is designed to prevent criminal proceeds from entering or moving through the Korean financial system. 1. Stronger KYC and Transaction Monitoring Requirements The first major change is the expansion of customer due diligence and risk-based monitoring obligations. Under the revised rules, financial institutions and VASPs will be expected to verify not only customer identity, but also: Source of funds Purpose of transactions Beneficial ownership (BO) Ongoing transaction behavior and risk profile Electronic KYC (e-KYC), non-face-to-face identity verification, and real-time suspicious transaction detection systems are becoming effectively mandatory operational standards. The revised framework also strengthens the Risk-Based Approach (RBA) and Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) requirements for high-risk customers and transactions. In other words, AML compliance in Korea is moving away from a simple “ID verification” model toward a continuous risk management model. For crypto exchanges and fintech operators, this means AML systems must function as active monitoring infrastructure rather than passive onboarding procedures. 2. Expanded Reporting Obligations and Stronger Travel Rule Enforcement The second major reform focuses directly on virtual asset transactions. Stricter Entry Requirements for VASPs Korean regulators are strengthening licensing and registration standards for virtual asset businesses. Proposed measures include enhanced screening of: Major shareholders Executives and management personnel Financial soundness and governance structures The regulatory approach increasingly resembles traditional financial institution supervision. Expanded Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR) Proposed amendments to the enforcement decree and supervisory regulations would effectively require mandatory suspicious transaction reporting (STR) for certain virtual asset transactions exceeding KRW 10 million. The final regulations are expected to be confirmed around July 2026. Expansion of the Travel Rule Korea is also moving toward broader implementation of the Travel Rule. The proposed changes would: Expand sender/recipient information transmission requirements Increase the scope of covered transactions Impose additional verification obligations on receiving VASPs For VASPs operating in Korea, AML obligations are no longer limited to registration requirements. They are becoming a central factor affecting operational design, transaction processing, onboarding policies, and even fee structures. 3. Broader AML Accountability and Expansion to Professional Service Providers The third major reform concerns governance, accountability, and expansion of regulated entities. AML Officers Elevated to Executive-Level Responsibility Korean regulators are pushing to formalize AML reporting officers as executive-level positions. This means boards of directors and senior management will be expected to assume direct responsibility for AML governance and oversight. AML compliance is increasingly treated as a corporate governance issue rather than merely an internal compliance function. Formalization of AML Compliance Evaluations The amendments would also codify AML system evaluations into law. Participation in regulatory AML assessments may become mandatory, and penalties are expected for: Refusing to submit materials Providing false information Obstructing regulatory reviews Expansion to DNFBPs Korea is also formally considering AML obligations for Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions (DNFBPs), including: Lawyers Accountants Tax advisors The government has indicated that further amendments aligned with FATF standards are under discussion for 2026. This signals a broader regulatory trend: AML obligations are expanding beyond banks and crypto exchanges into the wider professional services ecosystem. What Should Companies Prepare Before August 20, 2026? With the revised law taking effect on August 20, 2026, companies have limited time to review and upgrade their AML frameworks. Financial institutions, fintech operators, and VASPs should now assess: Internal AML policies and procedures KYC and monitoring systems Transaction screening capabilities Governance and reporting structures Travel Rule compliance processes Risk-based customer classification systems For many businesses, the real legal risk will not come from the existence of AML obligations themselves, but from failing to implement operational systems that regulators consider “effective” in practice. If your company is preparing for Korean AML compliance, virtual asset regulation, or VASP-related legal risk management, the Virtual Asset Team at Decent Law Firm can assist with regulatory analysis, compliance structuring, and AML framework reviews.
2026-05-06 Naver Blog -
Blogs Crypto
Crypto Signal Group Refunds in Korea: A Lawyer’s 4-Step Strategy (Watch for Recovery Scams)
Why is it so hard to get a refund from crypto signal groups? Many “signal groups” on Telegram or KakaoTalk advertise “principal guaranteed” or “monthly returns of X%.” However, their terms usually include broad disclaimers such as “all investment decisions are the user’s responsibility.” They also label their signals as “for reference only,” which is often used to avoid liability. In practice, some of these operations may involve: Unlicensed investment advisory services Profit-sharing structures that may trigger regulatory violations Potential issues under Korean laws on fraud, quasi-receipt of funds, or capital markets regulations For this reason, crypto signal group disputes are not just civil refund claims—they often involve criminal law considerations as well. Before pursuing a refund, check this first From our experience at Decent Law Firm’s Digital Asset Team, the key factor is not how much you invested, but how you were induced to join and how the service was structured. That makes early evidence collection critical. Capture ads and onboarding materials Save screenshots showing phrases like “guaranteed returns” or “risk-free investment,” including the platform (YouTube, Instagram, blogs, etc.). Secure payment records and refund terms Keep receipts, transfer records, account holder details (individual vs. company), and any written refund policies. Preserve communication and signal history Archive Telegram/KakaoTalk chats, signal logs, and any coercive language such as “just trust and follow.” Practical legal approach for recovery In practice, refund cases are not handled in a single step but through a structured sequence of actions. First, you need to clearly document your intent to terminate the service and request a refund. This should be done through channels such as chat, email, or text message, and should include when you joined, what service you received, what losses occurred, and why you are requesting a refund. Keeping screenshots and backups of this communication is essential. Next, rather than relying on informal complaints, it is often effective to send a formal legal notice through a lawyer. This document outlines misleading elements such as guaranteed returns, identifies potential legal violations, and sets a clear deadline and method for repayment. A properly structured legal notice often changes how the operator responds. At the same time, it is important to review whether the case involves criminal or regulatory issues such as fraud, illegal fundraising, or unlicensed advisory services. Filing complaints with investigative authorities or financial regulators can create additional pressure and may influence settlement negotiations. However, this step should be carefully aligned with the overall recovery strategy. If the operator refuses to refund or becomes unresponsive, the case may proceed to civil enforcement measures such as payment orders, damages claims, or asset freezing (including bank accounts, real estate, or crypto assets). Where multiple victims are involved, it may also be necessary to evaluate whether a coordinated group approach is more effective than individual claims. Beware of “recovery services” — secondary scams After suffering losses, victims are often approached by so-called recovery agencies claiming: “100% refund guaranteed” “Full refund if we lose” Be cautious if: Upfront fees are required The lawyer’s identity cannot be verified The service is not structured as a proper legal engagement These are common signs of secondary fraud. At Decent Law Firm, all matters are handled directly by licensed attorneys, with transparent communication throughout the case. What to prepare before consulting a lawyer To receive a meaningful assessment, prepare: Screenshots of advertisements and chat history showing how you joined Payment and transaction records Terms of service or refund policies Records of your refund request and their responses During the initial consultation, we assess: Refund viability Strength of evidence Optimal legal strategy (civil + criminal coordination) Crypto signal group disputes are time-sensitive and evidence-driven. The earlier you act, the higher the chances of recovery. If you are unsure whether your case qualifies for a refund or what steps to take next, consulting a legal professional early can make a significant difference.
2026-04-30 Naver Blog -
Blogs Criminal
An Arrest Warrant Has Been Requested — What You Must Do Right Now
What Is a Detention Hearing (Pre-Arrest Warrant Review)? A detention hearing in Korea is a court procedure where a judge decides whether a suspect should be detained after a prosecutor files for an arrest warrant. This system was introduced through amendments to the Korean Criminal Procedure Act in 1995 and has been fully implemented since 1997. Its purpose is to ensure that the suspect is given an opportunity to explain their position before being detained. At the hearing, the judge does not determine guilt or innocence. Instead, the judge evaluates whether detention is necessary based on the following factors: Whether the suspect has a stable residence (this includes actual living arrangements, family ties, and employment — not just the registered address) Whether there is a risk of evidence destruction Whether there is a risk of flight In short, the key issue is not “Did the suspect commit the crime?” but rather “Is detention necessary at this stage?” What Happens If the Warrant Is Granted or Denied? Outcome Meaning Next Steps Warrant Denied No detention Investigation and trial proceed while the suspect remains free Warrant Issued Detention in a detention center Investigation and trial proceed while the suspect is in custody Reapplication Prosecutor may refile after supplementing the case Another detention hearing may be held (if the original grounds for denial are not resolved, it may be denied again) If the warrant is denied, the suspect can prepare their defense while remaining at liberty. If the warrant is issued, the suspect will be detained, which significantly restricts both daily life and the ability to prepare a legal defense. This makes the detention hearing a critical turning point in the entire criminal process. The 24-Hour Golden Window — What Your Lawyer Does The period immediately following a warrant request is often referred to as the “golden 24 hours.” During this time, the role of a defense lawyer is crucial. A lawyer does far more than provide general assistance. The goal is to persuasively demonstrate to the court that detention is unnecessary. Key actions include: Quickly analyzing the suspect’s situation and the prosecution’s claims Preparing and submitting a written legal opinion to the court before the hearing Presenting evidence of: Residential stability Employment and family ties Willingness to cooperate with the investigation Lack of risk of evidence destruction Attending the hearing with the suspect and responding directly to the judge’s questions Even with the same allegations, the outcome can vary significantly depending on how the defense is prepared and presented. A detention hearing is not a procedure you should face unprepared. Your Response Starts the Moment You Are Notified Once you are informed that an arrest warrant has been requested, the response must begin immediately. At Decent Law Firm, our criminal defense team provides rapid and strategic support from the moment a warrant request is made — from preparing for the detention hearing to developing a non-custodial defense strategy. Our focus is on: Quickly understanding the facts of the case Identifying the most effective defense approach within a limited timeframe Presenting a structured and persuasive argument to prevent detention If you or someone close to you is facing an arrest warrant request in Korea, seek legal assistance without delay. Time is the most critical factor.
2026-04-29 Naver Blog -
Blogs Crypto
Crypto SNS Promotion—Accomplice Risk? Korea Virtual Asset Law Guide
What You Must Know Before Your First Investigation Since the enforcement of Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act, regulatory scrutiny over crypto-related activities has intensified significantly. As a result, individuals involved in meme coins, altcoins, and DeFi projects—often in limited roles—are increasingly being called in for investigation. A key trend is that even those who did not lead or design a project, but only handled SNS marketing, community management, or translation, are sometimes booked as accomplices. What Conduct Is Considered Illegal? The Act broadly regulates unfair trading practices in virtual assets. In practice, the following types of conduct frequently become legal issues: Market Manipulation: Artificial trading volume, bot-driven buy/sell activity False or Misleading Disclosures: Spreading exaggerated or false “positive news” through SNS or communities Rug Pull Schemes: Pre-acquiring tokens and selling them after attracting investors Engagement Manipulation: Inflating followers or transaction metrics Use of Insider Information: Trading based on non-public listing or project information In many cases, multiple charges—such as fraud, unfair trade practices, and insider trading—are applied together. “I Only Did Marketing—Why Am I Being Treated as an Accomplice?” This is one of the most common questions in crypto investigations. Even if you did not understand the full structure of the project or earned minimal compensation, authorities may still view your actions as part of a broader scheme to induce investment. Activities such as managing SNS accounts, posting promotional content, or maintaining community engagement can be interpreted as contributing to the overall transaction structure. The key legal issue is intent (knowledge and awareness): Did you recognize the illegality of the conduct? Were you aware that the project structure was deceptive or unsustainable? Did you understand how tokens were distributed and monetized? Your level of awareness can significantly affect how your involvement is legally assessed. Situations That Require Immediate Legal Review You should seek legal advice promptly if any of the following apply: You joined a crypto project through personal connections and handled SNS, marketing, or translation You posted promotional or investor-attracting content on official channels You received tokens or cash as compensation You cut off contact after fraud allegations surfaced or have already been contacted by investigators Even one of these factors may expose you to legal risk under Korean law. If an Arrest Warrant Is Filed Crypto-related cases rely heavily on digital evidence, including blockchain transaction records, SNS activity logs, and mobile forensic data. When a warrant is reviewed, courts consider: Risk of evidence destruction Risk of flight Seriousness of the alleged offense Your specific role and level of involvement The time between a warrant request and the court hearing is extremely short. During this window, it is critical to clearly organize and present your actual level of involvement and lack of intent. Why Crypto Cases Require Specialized Legal Counsel Crypto investigations involve both legal and technical complexity. Without a clear understanding of blockchain transactions, token distribution mechanisms, and smart contract structures, even the factual analysis of a case can be flawed. At Decent Law Firm, our digital asset team provides end-to-end representation, including: Early-stage investigation response and strategy Police and prosecutor interview preparation Arrest warrant hearing defense Full trial representation Our approach goes beyond simple denial. We focus on demonstrating the absence of intent and clarifying the actual scope of involvement through structured legal defense. If you or someone close to you is under investigation, early legal intervention is essential. In crypto-related cases, the outcome is often shaped at the very beginning.
2026-04-28 Naver Blog -
Blogs Corporate & Biz
Startup M&A: Why It’s Back in Focus in 2026—and How to Use It Strategically
M&A is no longer a last resort. It has become a core strategy for accelerating growth. The global M&A market has clearly entered a recovery phase in 2026. As the pace of technological change continues to accelerate, companies are finding it increasingly difficult to keep up through internal development alone. As a result, acquiring critical technologies, data, and platforms through M&A has become a more prominent and practical strategy. This shift is especially visible in the startup ecosystem. Startup M&A as a Growth Strategy Today, many founders no longer view M&A as something to consider only when the company is struggling. Instead, it is increasingly used as a proactive tool to scale faster. Raising capital alone often has limits—whether in expanding market share, building in-house technology, or hiring top-tier talent. Acquiring a company with the capabilities you need can be a far more efficient solution. Common M&A approaches include: Horizontal Integration: Acquiring competitors or similar services to rapidly expand customer base and revenue (common in e-commerce, SaaS, and platform businesses) Acqui-hire: Acquiring teams with strong technical capabilities to secure both talent and intellectual property (frequent in AI, fintech, and legal tech) AI Roll-up Strategy: Acquiring underperforming companies and improving operational efficiency through AI (applicable across industries) In particular, industries such as healthcare, logistics, and legal tech—where data and automation are critical—are seeing a growing number of cases where larger SaaS companies acquire AI startups to enhance their product offerings. The Korean Market and Key Strategic Sectors In Korea, investment capital in 2026 is being concentrated in six key sectors: AI, biotech, content, defense, energy, and advanced manufacturing. Alongside this trend, founders are increasingly thinking beyond the traditional “fundraising → growth” model. Instead, a more strategic cycle is emerging: fundraising → strategic M&A → accelerated growth For startups operating with limited resources but facing intense competition, M&A can be one of the most powerful tools to quickly expand market presence and reshape the competitive landscape. When Should Your Company Consider M&A? For startups and growth-stage companies, there are several practical scenarios where M&A becomes highly relevant: Market Entry: When you need immediate access to local networks or infrastructure in a new market Technology Bottlenecks: When critical technology already exists externally but would take years to build in-house Team Building Challenges: When you want to onboard a proven, high-performing team at once Post-Investment Strategy: When you need to deploy capital efficiently after a major funding round However, M&A should never be pursued as an end in itself. A single transaction can impact shareholding structure, control, investor relations, tax, and employment matters. Without a clear post-merger integration (PMI) plan, even a well-executed deal may fail to deliver meaningful results. For Companies Considering M&A At Decent Law Firm, our Corporate Practice Group provides end-to-end legal support for startups, venture-backed companies, and SMEs throughout the entire M&A lifecycle. Our services include: Structuring and negotiating share purchase and asset transfer agreements Reviewing investment agreements and shareholder arrangements Conducting legal due diligence and transaction structuring Managing legal risks during post-merger integration (PMI) We approach M&A not as a one-time transaction, but as a continuous strategic process that directly impacts your company’s long-term growth. Ultimately, the key question is not whether to pursue M&A, but when and how to use it effectively. The right approach depends entirely on your company’s stage, resources, and strategic goals. If you are exploring whether M&A could be a viable growth strategy for your business, we encourage you to reach out. Our team will work closely with you to assess realistic options and design a tailored approach aligned with your objectives.
2026-04-27 Naver Blog -
Blogs Criminal
Custody Review in Korea: Lawyer Fees and Release Within 48 Hours
1. What Is a Custody Review (구속적부심사)? When a family member or close contact is suddenly detained, most people are unsure what to do next. However, even after detention, there is a legal procedure in Korea that allows you to request release through the court—this is called a custody review (구속적부심사). A custody review is a process where the court re-examines whether the detention is lawful and necessary. Even if a detention warrant has already been issued, the detainee may be released if the grounds for detention are insufficient or excessive. The procedure moves very quickly: Filing deadline: Within 7 days from the date of detention Court hearing: Within 48 hours after filing Decision: Typically within 24 hours after the hearing The request can be filed not only by the detainee, but also by a spouse, immediate family member, or attorney. 2. Why Hiring a Lawyer Is Critical A custody review is effectively a one-time opportunity. In principle, it cannot be refiled, which means the initial strategy is crucial. In practice, cases handled with legal representation show a significantly higher likelihood of release compared to those without. This is because an experienced criminal defense lawyer will: Analyze and challenge the legal basis for detention Rebut concerns about flight risk or evidence tampering Present strong personal circumstances (residence, employment, family ties) Structure persuasive arguments tailored to the court’s decision-making Given the extremely limited preparation window of 48 hours, professional legal support can directly impact the outcome. 3. Lawyer Fees for Custody Review Legal fees for a custody review vary depending on the complexity of the case and the experience of the lawyer. In general: Starting from approximately KRW 3 million Can exceed KRW 10 million for complex or serious cases However, more important than the cost is the lawyer’s ability to respond immediately. In custody review cases, speed and coordination often matter more than the fee itself. 4. What to Look for When Choosing a Lawyer In urgent detention situations, the right lawyer can make a decisive difference. You should focus on the following: • Immediate client access (detention visit) A lawyer must meet the detainee as soon as possible to understand the case details, prior statements, and investigation status. Early intervention prevents unfavorable statements from being solidified. • Hearing preparation Court hearings are often brief—sometimes just 10 to 20 minutes. The detainee must be prepared in advance on how to respond clearly and calmly. Without preparation, nervous or inconsistent answers may negatively affect the outcome. • Evidence and document preparation Key supporting documents—such as proof of residence, employment certificates, family records, medical documents, and written statements—must be gathered within 48 hours. Identifying and organizing these effectively requires legal experience. 5. What You Should Do Immediately After Detention If someone close to you has been detained, you should promptly check the following: Whether the 7-day filing window has passed Whether the stated grounds for detention are excessive or inaccurate Whether a lawyer can be appointed immediately for rapid response Delays at this stage can significantly reduce the chances of release. Decent Law Firm – Criminal Defense Team A custody review is a race against time. The outcome depends on how quickly and strategically the case is handled. Decent Law Firm provides: Emergency detention visits Preparation and filing of custody review petitions Full representation at court hearings Detention is not the end—it is the beginning of legal response. The 48-hour window is critical. Acting quickly can make all the difference.
2026-04-27 Naver Blog -
Blogs Crypto
Cryptocurrency Delisting by Korean Exchanges: What Projects Should Check First
1. Practical Risks of Delisting for Crypto Projects A trading support termination (delisting) by a Korean cryptocurrency exchange is a critical event that can affect both the sustainability of the project and the protection of its investors. Recently, as major Korean exchanges have increasingly designated tokens as “investment caution” and proceeded with delistings, legal disputes initiated by project teams have also been on the rise. From a practical standpoint, delisting is far more than simply losing access to one exchange. Once trading support is terminated, liquidity drops sharply, often leading to a significant decline in asset value. At the same time, investor confidence deteriorates, which can delay or even derail fundraising efforts and strategic partnerships. In many cases, community disengagement follows, threatening the sustainability of the entire ecosystem. 2. Key Legal Issue: Transparency and Predictability of the Process In practice, the main legal challenge is not just the delisting decision itself, but the process leading up to it. Projects frequently raise concerns that exchanges do not provide clear or measurable criteria for maintaining listings after an “investment caution” designation. Even when projects submit requested materials and explanations, some report receiving delisting notices without detailed feedback or meaningful communication. While exchanges are generally granted broad discretion in listing and delisting decisions, that discretion is not unlimited. If the decision-making process appears arbitrary or inconsistent with contractual terms and exchange policies, it may give rise to legal disputes. Ultimately, the key legal questions are whether the procedure was properly followed and whether the decision was reasonable. 3. Legal Remedy: Injunction to Suspend Delisting In response to delisting notices, project teams are increasingly moving beyond public statements and considering formal legal action. One of the primary legal tools is an injunction to suspend the effectiveness of the delisting decision. This allows the project to request that the court temporarily halt the delisting until a final judgment is made. If granted, trading support may continue during the litigation period. However, Korean courts tend to recognize the broad discretion of exchanges in selecting and maintaining listed assets. As a result, injunctions are typically granted only when there are clear procedural defects or evidence of abuse of discretion. This makes it essential for projects to rely on well-organized evidence and legal arguments, rather than general claims or public pressure. 4. Essential Checklist After Receiving a Delisting Notice Upon receiving a delisting notice, projects should immediately organize key materials to establish a legal basis for their position. These include: Listing agreements and trading support contracts Exchange terms of service and listing/maintenance/delisting policies Records of prior “investment caution” designations and responses Documentation of business progress and roadmap execution Compliance efforts, technical development, and security measures Investor protection policies and actions taken Having these materials prepared is crucial not only for negotiations with the exchange but also for any legal proceedings, including injunction filings. 5. Three Critical Points to Review Immediately Delisting cases are highly time-sensitive. Projects should focus on the following: Procedural validity: Was the delisting decision made in accordance with contractual terms and exchange rules? Communication process: Were the exchange’s requirements clearly communicated, and did the project respond adequately? Timing for legal action: Is there sufficient time to file for an injunction before the delisting takes effect? These factors will determine whether negotiation or legal action is the more effective strategy. 6. Early Strategy Determines the Outcome Cryptocurrency delisting disputes require both legal expertise and a deep understanding of the technical and regulatory landscape. Decent Law Firm has advised numerous crypto projects on listing-related legal opinions, regulatory compliance under Korean law (including AML and reporting obligations), and dispute resolution. Our approach focuses on aligning legal strategy with the operational realities of blockchain projects. If your project has received a delisting notice and is facing business or reputational risks, an early legal assessment can significantly impact the outcome. Organizing key facts and seeking timely advice is critical.
2026-04-24 Naver Blog -
Blogs Crypto
Criminal Liability for Crypto OTC Transactions in Korea: Proceeds of Crime Concealment & Defense Strategy
“I just sold crypto and received cash.” In practice, this explanation is no longer sufficient to avoid criminal liability in Korea. According to data released by the Korea Customs Service and the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) in February 2026, illegal foreign exchange transactions (“hwanchigi”) over the past five years reached KRW 11.5 trillion, with approximately 83% (KRW 9.5 trillion) involving virtual assets. In 2025 alone, suspicious transaction reports (STRs) related to money laundering hit a record high of 1.3 million cases, increasing by 300,000 compared to the previous year. A pending 2026 amendment to Korea’s Anti-Money Laundering regime is expected to expand the Travel Rule to transactions under KRW 1 million and grant the FIU authority to freeze suspicious accounts. Even small OTC crypto transactions are now actively monitored and traceable. 1. How the Act on Concealment of Criminal Proceeds Applies to Crypto OTC Transactions In practice, prosecutions typically arise through the following structures: ▪ Receiving USDT from non-residents and paying KRW domestically This structure may trigger both violations of the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act and the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment. Even if it appears to be a simple exchange service, it can be treated as illegal remittance or money laundering. ▪ “Lack of knowledge” is not always a valid defense Even if the party claims they did not know the counterparty was involved in criminal activity, courts may infer knowledge based on transaction size, frequency, and the use of cash. Korean courts increasingly apply a “should have known” standard based on objective circumstances. ▪ Even intermediary roles can lead to criminal liability Individuals who only handled KRW transfers—without directly trading crypto—have been convicted as accomplices if their actions contributed to the concealment or transfer of criminal proceeds. The key issue is not the form of the transaction, but the overall structure and role within the flow of funds. 2. Penalties — Multiple Laws Apply Simultaneously Crypto OTC cases in Korea rarely involve a single charge. The following statutes are often applied in parallel: ▪ Unregistered Virtual Asset Business (VASP) – Act on Reporting and Use of Certain Financial Transaction Information → Up to 5 years imprisonment or a fine up to KRW 50 million ▪ Acquisition, possession, or disposal of criminal proceeds – Act on Concealment of Criminal Proceeds → Up to 5 years imprisonment or a fine up to KRW 30 million ▪ Unreported foreign exchange transactions – Foreign Exchange Transactions Act → Up to 3 years imprisonment or a fine up to KRW 300 million ▪ Confiscation and forfeiture → Full confiscation or preservation of assets related to criminal proceeds Because these laws can be applied cumulatively, underestimating exposure based on a single charge can lead to serious misjudgment of legal risk. 3. Real Case — KRW 580 Billion OTC Operation Leading to Indictment In a recent case, the operator of an unregistered crypto OTC business was indicted and detained for transactions totaling approximately KRW 580 billion. The case involved the laundering of KRW 23.5 billion in proceeds from crypto fraud, which were used to purchase real estate under borrowed names. Authorities imposed asset preservation measures to secure confiscation. Notably, individuals who did not directly commit fraud but participated in the money flow structure were also prosecuted. The argument that “I only facilitated transfers” was rejected by the court. 4. Defense Strategy — Varies by Investigation Stage Early response is critical in these cases, and the strategy must be tailored to each stage: ▪ Account Freeze Stage Immediate legal review is required to assess grounds for lifting the freeze and limiting asset preservation. Delays can significantly expand the scope of frozen assets. ▪ Summons (Witness/Suspect Stage) Attending an interview alone and providing unstructured answers is highly risky. Statements should be prepared in advance with counsel, focusing on transaction details and knowledge of fund origins. ▪ Submission of Transaction Records Submitting records without legal review may expose unnecessary risks. The scope, format, and explanation of submitted materials should be strategically controlled. A misstep in early statements can directly affect indictment decisions, detention, and confiscation scope. These cases often involve both administrative sanctions and criminal proceedings, requiring a dual-track defense approach. 5. Frequently Asked Questions Q. I only sold crypto and received cash. Can I still be punished? Yes. Depending on the structure, frequency, and source of funds, the transaction may be classified as illegal remittance or money laundering—even if it appears to be a simple sale. Q. I didn’t know the counterparty was involved in crime. Lack of knowledge is a key defense, but authorities often argue that you “should have known” based on objective circumstances. Early legal strategy is essential. Q. What should I do if my account is frozen? You should immediately review the legal basis and explore options for lifting the freeze. Timing is critical. Legal Guidance for Crypto OTC Cases in Korea If you have received notice of an account freeze or contact from an investigative authority, your initial response can significantly impact the outcome. Decent Law Firm’s Digital Asset Team has extensive experience handling crypto OTC, illegal remittance, and USDT-related money laundering cases. Our approach goes beyond criminal defense—we analyze transaction structures and fund flows to build a comprehensive strategy.
2026-04-23 Naver Blog -
Blogs Crypto
Crypto API Trading in Korea: Unfair Trading Risks & Regulatory Response Guide
On April 13, 2026, the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) officially disclosed cases of unfair trading involving crypto API transactions. With approximately 30% of total crypto trading volume now executed via APIs, regulatory scrutiny is increasingly focused on this segment. A common misconception is that using an automated trading program limits personal liability. However, even if trades are executed by an algorithm, legal responsibility remains with the individual who configured and operated the system. Key Unfair Trading Patterns Identified by Korean Regulators The cases identified by the FSS reflect classic market manipulation behaviors that may lead to criminal liability under Korean law. Repeated Small-Volume Trades Executing frequent buy and sell orders in small amounts to artificially inflate trading volume. Spoofing (Order Placement and Cancellation) Placing buy orders and repeatedly canceling them to create a false impression of strong market demand. Wash Trading Across Multiple Accounts Using multiple accounts to trade with oneself in order to simulate market activity or influence price movement. Layering with High-Price Orders Continuously placing buy orders at higher prices to drive the market price upward toward a target level. Importantly, under Korean Supreme Court standards, liability may arise even without actual price impact—mere potential to manipulate the market can be sufficient. This means that even pre-built or third-party trading algorithms may expose users to legal risks if such patterns are executed. Legal Risks Often Overlooked by API Trading Users The Financial Supervisory Service has made it clear that automation does not eliminate accountability. In practice, liability may arise in the following situations: Using trading scripts or bot code obtained from online communities or social media API key leakage allowing third parties to execute unlawful trades under your account Participating—knowingly or unknowingly—in coordinated trading patterns that influence market prices Under the Act on the Protection of Virtual Asset Users, penalties can be severe. Depending on the scale of illicit gains, sanctions may include long-term imprisonment, reflecting the seriousness of such violations. How to Respond if Contacted by the FSS Crypto exchanges in Korea operate automated surveillance systems to detect abnormal trading activity. These findings are reported to the Financial Supervisory Service, and once flagged, a regulatory review may begin. If you are contacted, it is critical to understand that this is not a routine inquiry but the early stage of a formal investigation. ✔️ Request for Transaction Records Do not submit materials without prior legal review. Over-disclosure may broaden the scope of suspicion. ✔️ Request for Appearance or Interview You should attend with legal counsel and prepare a clear, consistent explanation of your trading strategy and system configuration. ✔️ Account Freeze An account freeze is typically a signal that the matter has escalated to a criminal investigation phase. Administrative sanctions and criminal proceedings may proceed in parallel. How Decent Law Firm Approaches These Cases Decent Law Firm’s Digital Asset Team handles cases involving API trading, market manipulation allegations, and violations of Korean crypto regulations. Our approach goes beyond standard defense. We analyze transaction data to identify risk patterns, distinguish between automated execution and user intent, and structure a defense strategy that clearly defines the scope of liability. We also ensure consistency from the earliest stage—especially in document submission and initial statements—so that legal risks do not escalate unnecessarily. If you have been contacted by regulators or are concerned about potential exposure, early-stage legal review is critical. Even if your situation is not fully organized, an initial assessment can significantly impact the outcome.
2026-04-22 Naver Blog
