FIU, controversy over lenient punishment for virtual asset service providers.
The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU)'s penalties for virtual asset service providers have sparked controversy over leniency. Despite numerous issues, such as only investigating 1.4% of suspicious transaction reports due to the same person review history and failing to address 011 and 017 numbers, investors are criticizing the light penalties imposed on exchanges, including the number of violations and fines.
(omitted)
Pureun “Ian” Hong, managing partner at Decent Law Firm, commented, "The penalties imposed after the recent disciplinary committee review — including a fine of 492 million KRW, reprimands, and warnings — can hardly be considered a strong response. However, the Financial Services Commission seems to have focused on encouraging improvement by the businesses, while also warning of stricter penalties for similar issues in the future."
He further added, "From an investor's perspective, it is difficult to know which exchange violated anti-money laundering obligations. Some serious offenses, such as exchange employees trading virtual assets under family members' names, were not disclosed, leaving investors without full access to important information. In the future, it would be more desirable for more information to be disclosed in cases of such legal violations, providing investors with better standards when choosing an exchange."
