Attorney Pureun “Ian” Hong from Decent Law Firm: The existence of DAXA itself is contradictory.
During the 'NBNTV WEMIX Coinone Relisting Debate' held on the 24th, Pureun “Ian” Hong, managing partner of Decent Law Firm, stated, "DAXA was created due to a legal gap, but since there is no way to sanction member companies that do not follow decisions due to this legal void, the existence of DAXA itself can be seen as contradictory."
When asked about his views on the notion that DAXA's self-regulation could be viewed as collusion, Hong explained, 'DAXA's defense regarding collusion is, “We are not a compulsory body. Even if we make decisions, each individual member exchange is not obligated to follow them. They make their own decisions by agreement, so it is not collusion.”'
He further added, "Coinone's unilateral decision to relist essentially proves that point. Since DAXA’s member exchanges are not required to follow decisions, they really didn’t follow it. This contradiction arises because DAXA is a self-regulatory body, and unless a legal foundation is established, issues of communication breakdown and lack of consensus will continue to occur."
Additionally, he commented, "If a new exchange enters the won market by obtaining a real-name account, it will become a competitor to the five major exchanges. While they may unite to oppose it, apart from Upbit, most of the exchanges are struggling due to the crypto winter. So, each exchange may make decisions based on its own interests."
He concluded by saying, "I hope the government swiftly establishes relevant laws to help protect investors and promote a healthy market order."
