Successful Prosecution of Cryptocurrency Fraud

Case Details: The victims were persuaded to invest based on the defendant’s representations that “a listing on a major exchange was imminent” and “high returns were guaranteed within a short period of time.”

The defendant falsely claimed that institutional investment had already been secured and that the project’s development was substantially complete. These statements were later revealed to be entirely fabricated and intended solely to induce investment.

The investigation confirmed that there was, in fact, no concrete cryptocurrency development or exchange listing plan in place. The invested funds were not used for any legitimate business purposes but were instead diverted for the defendant’s personal use or to pay returns to earlier investors—constituting a classic Ponzi scheme.

Although the victims initially hesitated to pursue legal action out of concern that their losses might be dismissed as ordinary investment risk, Decent Law Firm’s Digital Asset Practice Group determined that the matter constituted criminal fraud rather than a mere investment failure. Acting on this assessment, the firm represented the victims in filing a criminal complaint.

Decent's Strategy: 1. Establishing Deception and Falsity of Representations

The firm conducted a comprehensive review of investment presentation materials, promotional content, and communications exchanged via Telegram and other messaging platforms.

This analysis demonstrated that core inducements—such as the promised major exchange listing and purported institutional investment—were entirely false and were submitted as objective evidence.

2. Proving Criminal Intent Through Fund Tracing

By tracing the flow of funds, the firm established that the investment capital was not used for cryptocurrency development or project operations, but instead for personal expenditures and rollover payments to other investors.

This evidence was critical in proving that the defendant never intended to operate a legitimate business from the outset.

3. Demonstrating Organized and Repeated Criminal Conduct

Rather than presenting isolated victim statements, the firm systematically organized testimony from multiple victims to show that the defendant’s actions were deliberate, repetitive, and planned—strengthening the prosecution’s case before both investigators and the court.

Outcome: "Sentence: 7 Years’ Imprisonment“

The court held that the defendant’s conduct could not be regarded as legitimate investment solicitation and found clear intent to defraud victims from the beginning.

All arguments presented by Decent Law Firm were fully accepted, resulting in a sentence of seven years’ imprisonment.

Through meticulous evidence collection and precise legal argumentation, what could have been dismissed as an investment loss was conclusively established as a serious criminal fraud.

As a result, the victims achieved criminal accountability and secured a favorable position for pursuing financial recovery.

#Cryptocurrency fraud # Crypto scam prosecution # Ponzi scheme crypto # Investment fraud sentencing # Digital asset criminal defense