디센트 법률사무소│DECENT LAW FIRM

Case Details: This case involved multiple charges under the Narcotics Control Act, including the use and trafficking of methamphetamine, smoking and selling cannabis seeds, and possession and use of ketamine. The client was initially convicted in the lower court, with a relatively lenient sentence due to the defense by Decent Law Firm.

However, the prosecution deemed the sentence excessively light and appealed to the High Court, seeking a severe sentence of nine years in prison.

At the appellate level, Decent Law Firm countered the prosecution's appeal by highlighting the client’s genuine remorse, efforts to prevent reoffending, and the disproportionate nature of the prosecution’s request. The defense filed a counter-appeal citing unfair sentencing practices.

Decent's Strategy: Decent Law Firm emphasized the following factors to reduce the client’s sentence:

1. The client voluntarily admitted to the crimes and cooperated fully with authorities.
2. Active efforts toward rehabilitation, including voluntary cessation of drug use and participation in anti-reoffending programs.
3. Strong family and social support systems indicating a low likelihood of reoffending.
4. A prior clean record of being a productive member of society before the offenses.

The defense presented compelling arguments that the sentence requested by the prosecution was excessive and contrary to principles of fairness.

Outcome: "2 Years and 6 Months Sentence Rendered"

The High Court acknowledged the client’s genuine remorse, efforts toward rehabilitation, and low risk of recidivism. Taking into account the positive contributions the client made to society prior to the offenses, the court sentenced the defendant to 2 years and 6 months in prison, significantly lower than the prosecutor’s 9-year recommendation.

This successful outcome demonstrated the effectiveness of Decent Law Firm’s meticulous preparation and strong advocacy.

#Drugs # DrugAppeal # DrugDefenseLawyer # Methamphetamine # Cannabis

국문 KR 영문 EN