- 기업 · 스타트업
- 국제법무
- 가상자산 (디지털자산)
- VC · 금융
- IP · 기술
- 스포츠
Related News
-
BlogsFirst-Time Drug Offense in Korea: When Are Deferred Prosecution and Suspended Sentence Possible?
Legal Issues in First-Time Drug Offense Cases In Korean drug offense cases, being a first-time offender can be a favorable factor. However, it does not automatically lead to deferred prosecution or a suspended sentence. Prosecutors and courts consider a range of factors, including the type of drug involved, the nature of the conduct, the number of uses, whether the case involved distribution or sale, and how the suspect responds during the investigation. This article explains when deferred prosecution and suspended sentences may be possible in first-time drug offense cases in Korea, and why early response during the investigation stage can significantly affect the outcome. Penalties Depending on the Type of Conduct The Narcotics Control Act of Korea classifies drug offenses based on the type of substance and the nature of the conduct. Even within the same drug-related case, the level of punishment can vary greatly depending on what the person is alleged to have done. Simple use or possession is generally assessed based on the type of drug, number of uses, whether there is a pattern of repeated use, and whether the person has any prior drug-related record. Involvement in transfer, delivery, or sale may be viewed more seriously than simple use. In these cases, how the substance was delivered, whether there was payment, and the person’s level of involvement become important issues. Drug sales or brokerage for profit are usually treated as more serious offenses. Depending on the substance and the degree of involvement, heavy statutory penalties may apply. For marijuana-related conduct, Article 61 of the Narcotics Control Act provides that certain acts involving marijuana may be punishable by imprisonment for up to five years or a fine of up to KRW 50 million. Although simple use or possession is generally treated less severely than sale, brokerage, or distribution-related conduct, the final outcome may still vary depending on the drug type, frequency of use, evidence of habitual use, and the suspect’s attitude during the investigation. When a First-Time Offender May Still Face Imprisonment Even if it is a first offense, imprisonment may still be imposed where aggravating circumstances are present. For example, the court may take a stricter view where the case involves repeated use of highly addictive substances, transfer or sale to another person, denial of the allegations despite clear evidence, concealment of evidence, or another criminal charge being prosecuted together with the drug offense. In these circumstances, the court may choose imprisonment over a suspended sentence. This is why it is important to clearly present favorable circumstances from the earliest stage of the case. A first-time offender status alone is rarely enough. The defense must show why the case should be treated as an isolated incident and why the risk of reoffending is low. When the Case May End Without Trial: Deferred Prosecution Deferred prosecution is a discretionary decision by the prosecutor. It means that the prosecutor recognizes the alleged offense but decides not to indict the suspect. Under Article 247 of the Criminal Procedure Act, prosecutors have discretion in deciding whether to bring charges. In practice, several factors are considered together. Deferred prosecution may be more likely where the suspect has no prior drug-related record, the conduct was limited to short-term use, the case involved personal use only, there was no transfer, recommendation, sale, or distribution to others, the suspect admits the facts and cooperates with the investigation, and there is a clear willingness to receive treatment or prevent recurrence. Family support, employment, stable residence, and other social ties may also be relevant because they can help show a lower risk of reoffending. However, even if these factors exist, deferred prosecution is never guaranteed. What matters is how concretely these circumstances are explained and supported with materials during the investigation stage. When the Case Goes to Trial: Suspended Sentence If the prosecutor files charges, a suspended sentence may still be possible. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act allows the court to suspend the execution of a sentence for a period of one to five years where the sentence is imprisonment or imprisonment without labor for up to three years, or a fine of up to KRW 5 million, and where there are circumstances favorable to the defendant. In drug cases, courts consider both favorable and unfavorable factors. These may include whether the defendant has prior drug-related convictions, the number of offenses, the type and addictiveness of the substance, the level of reflection, whether the defendant has received counseling or treatment, family or community support, age, occupation, and overall living environment. A sincere apology alone is usually not enough. Courts tend to look for concrete signs of rehabilitation, such as treatment records, counseling participation, a prevention plan, and evidence that the defendant has stable social support. The court makes its decision by weighing all relevant circumstances. No single factor is determinative, but the overall presentation of the case can strongly influence the result. Why Early Response During the Investigation Stage Matters In first-time drug offense cases, the dividing line between imprisonment, suspended sentence, and deferred prosecution is often shaped during the investigation stage. Statements made during police or prosecutor questioning, the scope of admission, timing of cooperation, willingness to receive treatment, and the materials submitted to the authorities can all affect the direction of the case. Preparing only after questioning has already taken place may limit the available defense strategy. In many cases, it is more effective to review the facts, organize the expected issues, and prepare supporting materials before appearing for questioning. Treatment records, counseling records, family support statements, employment records, and a concrete plan to prevent recurrence can be important materials in showing rehabilitation potential. If You Have Been Contacted by Korean Investigators For a first-time drug offense in Korea, deferred prosecution or a suspended sentence is not automatic. The outcome often depends on how the case is handled from the beginning. The drug crime defense team at DECENT Law Firm assists clients from the early investigation stage through trial, including case analysis, preparation for questioning, legal opinion submissions, and sentencing strategy. If you have been contacted by Korean investigators or have received a summons for questioning, it is important to review your situation before attending the interview. This content is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice for any specific case.
2026-06-01 -
Blogs
마약 초범 기소유예 집행유예, 적용 요건과 대응 방향
마약 초범 사건의 법적 쟁점 마약류 범죄에서 초범이라는 사실은 양형에 유리하게 작용하는 요소 중 하나입니다. 그러나 초범이라는 사정만으로 집행유예나 기소유예가 자동으로 결정되지는 않습니다. 약물의 종류, 행위 유형, 투약 횟수, 수사 과정에서의 태도 등 여러 요소가 복합적으로 고려됩니다. 이 글에서는 마약 초범 사건에서 기소유예와 집행유예가 각각 어떤 조건에서 가능한지, 그리고 수사 단계에서의 대응이 왜 결과에 영향을 미치는지를 설명합니다. 행위 유형에 따른 처벌 수위 마약류 관리에 관한 법률(이하 마약류관리법)은 약물의 종류와 행위 유형에 따라 적용 조문과 법정형을 세분화하고 있습니다. 동일한 마약 사건이라도 어떤 행위를 했느냐에 따라 처벌 수위가 크게 달라집니다. 구분 실무상 의미 단순 투약·소지 약물 종류, 투약 횟수, 상습성, 전과 여부에 따라 처분 수위가 달라집니다. 수수·매매 관여 단순 투약보다 불리하게 평가될 수 있으며, 타인에게 약물을 건넨 경위와 대가성 여부가 중요합니다. 영리 목적 매매·알선 가장 중하게 평가될 수 있는 유형으로, 약물 종류와 관여 정도에 따라 중한 법정형이 문제될 수 있습니다. 대마 흡연·소지 마약류관리법 제61조는 일정한 대마 관련 행위에 대해 5년 이하의 징역 또는 5천만 원 이하의 벌금을 정하고 있습니다. 단순 투약·소지는 일반적으로 매매·알선 등 유통 관여 유형보다 낮게 평가되는 경우가 많지만, 약물 종류와 횟수, 상습성, 수사 태도에 따라 결과는 달라질 수 있습니다. 초범에게도 실형이 선고되는 경우 초범이라도 다음과 같은 사정이 있는 경우 실형이 선고될 수 있습니다. 약물 종류와 횟수: 의존성이 강한 약물을 반복 사용한 경우 수수·매매 관여: 단순 투약을 넘어 타인에게 약물을 건네거나 거래에 관여한 경우 수사 비협조: 혐의를 부인하거나 증거를 은닉한 정황이 있는 경우 다른 범죄와 경합: 마약 혐의 외에 별도의 형사 사건이 병합되는 경우 이러한 사정이 하나 이상 인정되는 경우 법원은 집행유예보다 실형을 선택할 수 있습니다. 유리한 정상을 구체적으로 소명하는 것이 결과에 직접적인 영향을 미치는 이유입니다. 재판 없이 끝날 수 있는 조건 (기소유예 조건) 기소유예는 검사가 범죄 사실을 인정하면서도 기소를 하지 않는 처분입니다. 형사소송법 제247조에 따른 검사의 재량 처분으로, 전과 기록이 남지 않습니다. 실무상 다음 요소들이 복합적으로 고려됩니다. 동종 전과 없음: 마약류 관련 전과가 없는 초범인 경우 단기 투약에 한정: 상습성이 인정되지 않는 수준 자가 투약에 한정: 타인에 대한 수수·권유·매매가 없는 경우 수사 협조 및 사실 인정: 혐의를 인정하고 수사에 적극 협조한 경우 치료 의지: 자발적 치료 진행 또는 치료 필요성 인정 사회적 유대: 가족, 직장, 주거 안정성 등 재범 방지 환경이 갖춰진 경우 이 요소들이 모두 충족된다고 해서 기소유예가 보장되는 것은 아닙니다. 수사 단계에서 이를 얼마나 구체적으로 소명하느냐가 검사의 판단에 영향을 줍니다. 재판까지 간 경우 (집행유예 판단 기준) 기소가 이루어진 경우에도 집행유예 선고가 가능합니다. 형법 제62조 제1항은 3년 이하의 징역이나 금고 또는 500만 원 이하의 벌금형을 선고할 경우, 정상에 참작할 만한 사유가 있으면 1년 이상 5년 이하의 기간 동안 형의 집행을 유예할 수 있다고 규정하고 있습니다. 대법원 양형위원회의 마약범죄 양형기준은 단순 투약·소지 사건에서 감경 인자가 인정될 경우 집행유예 선고가 가능한 권고 범위를 제시하고 있습니다. 실무상 집행유예 판단에서 중요하게 작용하는 요소는 다음과 같습니다. 동종 전과 여부 및 범행 횟수 사용 약물의 종류와 의존성 정도 반성의 구체성 (추상적 후회가 아닌 재발 방지 계획 포함) 치료 이력 또는 상담 진행 여부 가족·지인 탄원 등 사회적 유대 입증 피고인의 나이, 직업, 생활환경 재판부는 유리한 정상과 불리한 정상을 종합적으로 비교하여 선고형을 결정합니다. 이 중 어느 하나가 결정적인 것이 아니라, 여러 요소가 함께 고려됩니다. 수사 단계 대응이 실형을 막을 수 있습니다 마약 초범 사건에서 실형과 집행유예의 갈림길은 대부분 수사 단계에서 만들어집니다. 조사 과정에서의 진술 내용, 혐의 인정의 범위, 치료 의지 표명 시점, 수사기관에 제출하는 소명 자료의 구성이 검사의 처분 방향에 직접 영향을 줍니다. 조사를 받은 이후에 뒤늦게 준비하는 것보다 출석 전에 대응 방향을 정리하는 것이 결과에 유리합니다. 특히 치료 이력이나 상담 기록은 재범 방지 의지를 보여주는 자료로 활용될 수 있으므로, 출석 전부터 치료 필요성 및 재발 방지 계획을 검토하는 것이 실무상 의미가 있습니다. 마약 수사 연락을 받았다면, 먼저 확인해야 할 것 마약 초범 사건에서 기소유예와 집행유예는 자동으로 주어지는 결과가 아닙니다. 수사 단계에서의 진술 방향, 소명 자료 준비, 치료 이력 확보 여부가 결과에 실질적인 영향을 줍니다. 디센트 법률사무소 마약전담팀은 수사 초기 단계부터 재판까지 사안에 맞는 대응 방향을 실무 경험을 바탕으로 함께 검토합니다. 수사기관의 연락을 받으셨거나 출석 일정을 앞두고 계신다면, 조사 전에 현재 상황을 먼저 말씀해 주세요. 본 콘텐츠는 일반적인 법률 정보 제공을 목적으로 하며, 개별 사건에 대한 법률 조언을 구성하지 않습니다.
2026-06-01 -
Blogs
False Naver Blog Posts Targeting Your Business in Korea: How to Request Removal
When Online Defamation Affects Your Business in Korea In South Korea, Naver remains one of the most influential online platforms for search, blogs, and reputation management. For businesses operating in Korea, what appears on Naver can directly affect customer trust, business inquiries, and brand credibility. In recent years, some businesses have discovered Naver blog posts that mention their company or brand name together with words such as “scam,” “fraud,” or “victim warning.” These posts may appear professional and persuasive, even when the underlying facts are inaccurate, misleading, or unrelated to the business itself. For foreign-owned companies or international businesses operating in Korea, this type of reputational damage can be especially difficult to detect and respond to. The content may be written in Korean, indexed on Naver, and viewed as credible by local customers before the company becomes aware of it. Under the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (the “Network Act”), a business whose reputation or other rights have been infringed online may request deletion of the content or temporary blocking of access to the content. Applicable Law ▪️Article 44-2 of the Network Act: Deletion Requests and Temporary Measures Article 44-2(1) of the Network Act provides that a person whose rights, including privacy or reputation, have been infringed through information distributed via an information and communications network may request the relevant service provider to delete the information or publish a rebuttal. Under Article 44-2(2), once such a request is received, the service provider must take necessary measures, such as deletion or temporary blocking, without delay and notify both the requester and the person who posted the content. Where it is difficult to determine whether a rights infringement has occurred, or where a dispute between the parties is expected, Article 44-2(4) allows the service provider to temporarily block access to the content. The duration of such temporary measures may not exceed 30 days. ▪️Criminal Liability for Online Defamation If an online post contains false statements of fact that damage another person’s or company’s reputation, Article 70(2) of the Network Act may apply. The statutory penalty is imprisonment for up to seven years, disqualification for up to ten years, or a fine of up to KRW 50 million. Even if the statements are true, Article 70(1) may still apply if the post was made with intent to defame. In that case, the statutory penalty is imprisonment for up to three years or a fine of up to KRW 30 million. Category Legal Basis Possible Penalty Defamation by false statements of fact Network Act, Article 70(2) Up to 7 years’ imprisonment or KRW 50 million fine Defamation by true statements of fact Network Act, Article 70(1) Up to 3 years’ imprisonment or KRW 30 million fine Civil damages Civil Act, Article 750 Compensation for financial and reputational harm Criminal liability depends on the specific content, context, and intent behind the post. However, a business may still pursue platform-level removal or temporary blocking even where the criminal threshold is not yet clear. Key Legal Issues ▪️Scope of Defamation Under Article 44-2 The standard for requesting deletion or temporary blocking under Article 44-2 is broader than the standard for criminal defamation under Article 70 of the Network Act or Article 307 of the Criminal Act. In practice, the key issue is whether the online post infringes the company’s rights, including its reputation. It is not always necessary to prove criminal intent at the initial platform reporting stage. For example, if a Naver blog post places a company’s brand name next to terms such as “scam” or “fraud,” while the actual content concerns an unrelated impersonator or third party, the overall impression created for ordinary readers may still be misleading. In some cases, this may support a removal or temporary blocking request. Evidence of reputational harm is also important. Businesses should preserve records showing the impact of the post, such as customer complaints, cancelled inquiries, KakaoTalk messages, emails, screenshots, call logs, and changes in online search results. ▪️What Happens If the Poster Files an Objection If the person who posted the content files an objection, the temporary blocking may remain in effect for 30 days from the date the objection is received. After that period, the post may be restored. In that situation, the affected business may consider filing a defamation mediation request with the Korea Communications Standards Commission’s Internet Harm Relief Center. If mediation is successful, the settlement may have an effect similar to a civil settlement agreement. The Limits of Platform Reporting Alone Filing a removal request through Naver’s Rights Protection Center is an important first step, but it may not fully resolve the problem. If the poster files an objection, the content may be restored. If similar posts are uploaded again under different accounts or URLs, each post must usually be addressed separately. Where harmful posts are being published repeatedly or systematically, platform reporting alone may not be enough. In such cases, a formal letter of demand issued in the name of a Korean law firm, together with potential criminal complaints or civil damages claims, may be more effective. How Decent Law Firm Can Assist Responding to false or misleading online content in Korea requires more than simply submitting a platform report. Businesses must consider the wording of the removal request, the legal basis for rights infringement, the preservation of evidence, and the possibility of further civil or criminal action. Decent Law Firm assists businesses with each stage of this process, including removal requests, formal letters of demand, Korea Communications Standards Commission proceedings, criminal complaints, and civil damages claims where appropriate. If you have identified Naver blog posts or other online content that may be harming your business in Korea, please share the relevant URLs and a brief explanation of the impact. We will review the matter and advise on the most appropriate course of action. ※ This content is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice in relation to any specific matter.
2026-05-28
